Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Scientific and "radical" ethnomethodology: From incompatible paradigms to ethnomethodological sociology.Ilkka Arminen - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (2):167-191.
    Ethnomethodology has been torn between scientific and "radical" aspirations insofar as it moves discoursive practices from resources to the topic of the study. Scientific ethnomethodology, such as conversation analysis, studies discoursive praxis as its topic and resource. Standard scientific criteria are accepted to assess the merits of its findings. "Radical" ethnomethodology addresses mundane reasoning exclusively as its topic without recourse to standardized science. I will show that insofar as "radical" ethnomethodology succeeds in bracketing everyday resources, it loses its phenomenon with (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • The Methodological Implications of the Schutz-Parsons Debate.Christian Etzrodt - 2013 - Open Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):29-38.
    The aim of this paper is an analysis of the different standpoints of Parsons and Schutz concerning Weber’s suggestion that sociological explanations have to include the subjective point of view of the actors, the Cartesian Dilemma that the actor’s consciousness is not accessible to the researcher, and the Kantian Problem that theories are necessary in order to interpret sensory data, but that there is no guarantee that these theories are true. The comparison of Schutz’s and Parsons’s positions shows that Parsons’s (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations