Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Responsibility Gaps and Retributive Dispositions: Evidence from the US, Japan and Germany.Markus Kneer & Markus Christen - 2024 - Science and Engineering Ethics 30 (6):1-19.
    Danaher (2016) has argued that increasing robotization can lead to retribution gaps: Situations in which the normative fact that nobody can be justly held responsible for a harmful outcome stands in conflict with our retributivist moral dispositions. In this paper, we report a cross-cultural empirical study based on Sparrow’s (2007) famous example of an autonomous weapon system committing a war crime, which was conducted with participants from the US, Japan and Germany. We find that (1) people manifest a considerable willingness (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Exploring the psychology of LLMs’ Moral and Legal Reasoning.Guilherme F. C. F. Almeida, José Luiz Nunes, Neele Engelmann, Alex Wiegmann & Marcelo de Araújo - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Agent-Regret in Healthcare.Gavin Enck & Beth Condley - forthcoming - American Journal of Bioethics:1-15.
    For healthcare professionals and organizations, there is an emphasis on addressing moral distress and compassion fatigue among clinicians. While addressing these issues is vital, this paper suggests that the philosophical concept of agent-regret is a relevant but overlooked issue in healthcare. To experience agent-regret is to regret your harmful but not wrongful actions. This person’s action results in someone being killed or significantly injured, but it was ethically faultless. Despite being faultless, agent-regret is an emotional response concerning one’s agency in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Moral preference reversals: Violations of procedure invariance in moral judgments of sacrificial dilemmas.Justin F. Landy, Benjamin A. Lemli, Pritika Shah, Alexander D. Perry & Rebekah Sager - 2024 - Cognition 252 (C):105919.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Age‐Related Differences in Moral Judgment: The Role of Probability Judgments.Francesco Margoni, Janet Geipel, Constantinos Hadjichristidis, Richard Bakiaj & Luca Surian - 2023 - Cognitive Science 47 (9):e13345.
    Research suggests that moral evaluations change during adulthood. Older adults (75+) tend to judge accidentally harmful acts more severely than younger adults do, and this age‐related difference is in part due to the greater negligence older adults attribute to the accidental harmdoers. Across two studies (N = 254), we find support for this claim and report the novel discovery that older adults’ increased attribution of negligence, in turn, is associated with a higher perceived likelihood that the accident would occur. We (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases.Francesco Margoni & Teneille R. Brown - 2023 - Cognition 236 (C):105442.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation