Switch to: References

Citations of:

Unfinished Business

Philosophers' Imprint 23 (1): 4, 1-15 (2023)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Meaningful Lives and Meaningful Futures.Michal Masny - forthcoming - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    What moral reasons, if any, do we have to prevent the extinction of humanity? In “Unfinished Business,” Jonathan Knutzen argues that certain further developments in culture would make our history more ‘collectively meaningful,’ and that premature extinction would be bad because it would close off that possibility. Here, I critically examine this proposal. I argue that if collective meaningfulness is analogous to individual meaningfulness, then our meaning-based reasons to prevent the extinction of humanity are substantially different from the reasons discussed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Shape of History.Michal Masny - forthcoming - Journal of Moral Philosophy.
    Some philosophers believe in improvement: they think that the world is a better place than it used to be, and that future generations will fare even better. Others see decline: they claim that the condition of humanity has deteriorated and will continue to do so. Much ink has also been spilt over what explains these historical patterns. These two disagreements about the shape of history concern largely descriptive issues. But there is also a third, purely normative question that has been (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • High Risk, Low Reward: A Challenge to the Astronomical Value of Existential Risk Mitigation.David Thorstad - 2023 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 51 (4):373-412.
    Philosophy &Public Affairs, Volume 51, Issue 4, Page 373-412, Fall 2023.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (1 other version)Genetically engineered herbicide resistance, part two.Gary Comstock - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (2):114-146.
    Should we continue to support publicly funded research on genetically engineered herbicide resistant crops? In Part One, I discussed the difference between science and ethics, presented a brief history of weed control, and explained three moral principles undergirding my environmentalist perspective. I then argued that unqualified endorsement (E) of the research is unjustified, as is unqualified opposition (O). In Part Two, I argue against qualified endorsement (QE), and for qualified opposition (QO).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations