Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The ‘Domestication’ of Heredity: The Familial Organization of Geneticists at Cambridge University, 1895–1910.Marsha L. Richmond - 2006 - Journal of the History of Biology 39 (3):565-605.
    In the early years of Mendelism, 1900-1910, William Bateson established a productive research group consisting of women and men studying biology at Cambridge. The empirical evidence they provided through investigating the patterns of hereditary in many different species helped confirm the validity of the Mendelian laws of heredity. What has not previously been well recognized is that owing to the lack of sufficient institutional support, the group primarily relied on domestic resources to carry out their work. Members of the group (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Portrait of an Outsider: Class, Gender, and the Scientific Career of Ida M. Mellen. [REVIEW]Samantha K. Muka - 2014 - Journal of the History of Biology 47 (1):29-61.
    In 1916, a 41 year old woman with little formal scientific education became the secretary of the New York Aquarium. In becoming the Aquarium’s first female officer, Ida M. Mellen realized her lifelong dream of successfully pursuing a career in the biological sciences and broke with the limitations and low expectations surrounding her sex and class backgrounds. By 1930, Mellen left the NYA and pursued a career in popular hobbyist writing, becoming the foremost expert on aquarium fishes and domesticated cats (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Science education: History at the edge.John L. Rudolph - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2):270-273.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The economics of science.Arthur M. Diamond - 1996 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 9 (2):6-49.
    Increasing the “truth per dollar” of money spent on science is one legitimate long-run goal of the economics of science. But before this goal can be achieved, we need to increase our knowledge of the successes and failures of past and current reward structures of science. This essay reviews what economists have learned about the behavior of scientists and the reward structure of science. One important use of such knowledge will be to help policy-makers create a reward structure that is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations