Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Hegel’s Keplerian Revolution in Philosophy.Paul Redding - 2024 - Philosophies 9 (4):111.
    In this paper, I approach Hegel’s philosophy under the banner of a “Keplerian Revolution”, the implicit reference being, of course, to Kant’s supposed Copernican philosophical revolution. Kepler had been an early supporter of the Copernican paradigm in astronomy, but went well beyond his predecessor, and so is invoked here in an attempt to capture some of the important ways in which Hegel attempted to go beyond the philosophy of Kant. To make these issues more determinate, however, Hegel’s Keplerian orientation will (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The purpose of metaphysics: Apology of excess.Olena Yatsenko - forthcoming - Metaphilosophy.
    This article consistently elaborates the extra‐contextual nature of metaphysical knowledge. Metaphysicsis seen as a semantic construction of culture that produces a certain type of thinking, memory, and identification: that is, subjectivity, and sociality as an ethical and axiological model of interaction with the world and the Other. The paper argues that metaphysics is a kind of orientation in space and that culture is a semiotic way of world orientation, or collection of spaces into an intelligible structure, a specific characteristic of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Hegel’s (Anticipated) Answer to Peirce’s Stalled Critique of Cantor’s Analytic Continuum.Paul Redding - 2024 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 14 (2):479-507.
    Although Hegel is generally not known as a philosopher of mathematics, he maintained a deep interest in the history of mathematics, especially in its transformations between antiquity and the modern age. Charles S. Peirce, who was the son of a distinguished mathematician and was involved in developments in mathematics in the second half of the nineteenth century, was critical of what he perceived as Hegel’s lack of mathematical acumen. Nevertheless, he recognized in Hegel’s Science of Logic structural features of his (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark