Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Failure of n -uniqueness: a family of examples.Elisabetta Pastori & Pablo Spiga - 2011 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 57 (2):133-148.
    In this paper, the connections between model theory and the theory of infinite permutation groups are used to study the n-existence and the n-uniqueness for n-amalgamation problems of stable theories. We show that, for any n ⩾ 2, there exists a stable theory having -existence and k-uniqueness, for every k ⩽ n, but has neither -existence nor -uniqueness. In particular, this generalizes the example, for n = 2, due to Hrushovski given in 3. © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Disjoint $n$ -Amalgamation and Pseudofinite Countably Categorical Theories.Alex Kruckman - 2019 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 60 (1):139-160.
    Disjoint n-amalgamation is a condition on a complete first-order theory specifying that certain locally consistent families of types are also globally consistent. In this article, we show that if a countably categorical theory T admits an expansion with disjoint n-amalgamation for all n, then T is pseudofinite. All theories which admit an expansion with disjoint n-amalgamation for all n are simple, but the method can be extended, using filtrations of Fraïssé classes, to show that certain nonsimple theories are pseudofinite. As (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Generalized amalgamation and n -simplicity.Byunghan Kim, Alexei S. Kolesnikov & Akito Tsuboi - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 155 (2):97-114.
    We study generalized amalgamation properties in simple theories. We formulate a notion of generalized amalgamation in such a way so that the properties are preserved when we pass from T to Teq or Theq; we provide several equivalent ways of formulating the notion of generalized amalgamation.We define two distinct hierarchies of simple theories characterized by their amalgamation properties; examples are given to show the difference between the hierarchies.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Constructing the hyperdefinable group from the group configuration.Tristram de Piro, Byunghan Kim & Jessica Millar - 2006 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 6 (2):121-139.
    Under [Formula: see text]-amalgamation, we obtain the canonical hyperdefinable group from the group configuration.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Independence and the finite submodel property.Vera Koponen - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 158 (1-2):58-79.
    We study a class of 0-categorical simple structures such that every M in has uncomplicated forking behavior and such that definable relations in M which do not cause forking are independent in a sense that is made precise; we call structures in independent. The SU-rank of such M may be n for any natural number n>0. The most well-known unstable member of is the random graph, which has SU-rank one. The main result is that for every strongly independent structure M (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation