Switch to: References

Citations of:

Rights, wrongs, and responsibilities

New York: Palgrave (2001)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Some Conceptual Aspects of Temporality and the Ability to Possess Rights.Sandeep Sreekumar - 2015 - Ratio Juris 28 (3):330-353.
    Since certain temporal aspects of the relation between duties, rights, and the interests that rights protect have not been fully theorized, a puzzle arises when we come to consider whether and how entities such as members of future generations, fetuses, deceased persons, and unconscious persons are able to possess rights. This paper evolves a unified structure for attributing the ability to possess rights to such entities. It demonstrates that while, under any cogent theory of rights-attributions, rights and duties must be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)What Is Legal Philosophy?Matthew H. Kramer - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):125-134.
    This article delineates some of the main issues that are debated by philosophers of law. It explores the connections between legal philosophy and other areas of philosophy, while also seeking to specify the distinctiveness of many of the concerns that have preoccupied philosophers of law. It illustrates its abstract points with examples focused on the separability of law and morality, the nature of the rule of law, the nature of rights, justifications for the imposition of punishment, and the identification of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)On future generations' future rights.Axel Gosseries - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (4):446-474.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • (1 other version)VIII-Permissible Rescue Killings.Cécile Fabre - 2009 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt2):149-164.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Rights bearers and rights functions.Anna-Karin Margareta Andersson - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (6):1625-1646.
    The Will Theory of Rights has commonly been criticized for excluding from the class of rights bearers all subjects who are incapable of agency. The Interest Theory of Rights faces the challenge of avoiding undue proliferation of the class of rights bearers. I advance a novel argument for a specific demarcation of the class of rights bearers. I then argue that this demarcation implies that the function of the moral rights of subjects incapable of exercising agency is to protect them (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations