The application of continuous deep sedation in the treatment of intractable suffering at the end of life continues to be tied to a number of concerns that have negated its use in palliative care. Part of the resistance towards use of this treatment option of last resort has been the continued association of CDS with physician-associated suicide and/or euthanasia, which is compounded by a lack clinical guidelines and a failure to cite this treatment under the aegis of a palliative care (...) approach. I argue that reinstituting a palliative care-inspired approach that includes a holistic review of the patient’s situation and the engagement of a multidisciplinary team guided by clearly defined practice requirements that have been lacking amongst many prevailing guidelines will overcome prevailing objections to this practice and allow for the legitimization of this process. (shrink)

Good People, by Singaporean playwright Haresh Sharma, unmasks racial and religious tensions between Singapore’s increasingly diverse racial groups and the attendant ramifications on the healthcare ecosystem and the doctor-patient relationship. Drawing upon Michel Foucault’s notion of heterotopia, this paper argues that, in Good People, Sharma employs theater as a site of resistance by calling into question state and medical authority. First, state authority is challenged through the play’s scrutiny of the ideological principle of multiculturalism and its usefulness in fostering meaningful (...) cross-cultural exchanges and acceptance of different cultural and religious beliefs in the clinic. Second, the play destabilizes medical authority by surfacing the complex relationship between the doctor’s unconscious biases, racial and religious prejudice, and clinical judgment, thereby casting doubt on medicine’s claims of objectivity. In doing so, this paper argues, the play resists simplistic binary categorizations of the behaviors and motivations of the characters into good/bad or right/wrong, instead raising questions about power, knowledge, and contesting truths within the confines of the cultural space of a hospice. (shrink)

In Singapore, care of patients is often seen as part of the duty of the family unit with care decisions and treatment costs determined by the eldest son. Rising costs and increasing care needs, however, have led to the diversification of care roles. Understanding how these roles are determined is critical to decision-making, better patient care and effective communication with the family. This study seeks to explore the factors behind the selection of the main caregiver, who provides the majority of (...) physical care to the patient, and the decision-maker, who is tasked with deciding on treatment plans. Twenty-one oncologic patients and caregivers attending an ambulatory treatment unit at a tertiary oncology centre viewed a video vignette and were asked about the suitability of the three children who suggest different options to care of their mother following her diagnosis of metastatic terminal cancer. Participants were also asked what factors they considered when selecting a surrogate. Contrary to traditional reliance upon gender roles to determine care roles and duties, nearly 60% of caregivers and 40% of patients prioritised the availability, willingness and capability of family members, and their financial and personal situations in determining their choice of caregiver and surrogate decision-maker. The shift away from gender-determined roles stems from the evolving nature of Confucian beliefs that are influenced by practical and sociocultural considerations. These findings remind healthcare professionals that gender stereotypes have begun to fade and that they should continually review familial and cultural beliefs in care determinations at the end of life. (shrink)