Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Balancing rules in postmortem sperm donation.Guido Pennings - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (4):270-271.
    Postmortem sperm donation implies the acceptance of a very low sperm quality threshold. This threshold has two important consequences: recipients will have to submit to burdensome and expensive in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and many more living donors will be accepted, thus making postmortem donors largely superfluous. Given these strong arguments against the use of postmortem collected sperm, a good alternative to enlarge the donor pool would be men who stored sperm for self-use and no longer have the intention to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Postmortem non-directed sperm donation: quality matters.Joshua Parker & Nathan Hodson - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (4):263-264.
    In our paper ‘The ethical case for non-directed postmortem sperm donation’ we argued that it would be ethical for men to donate sperm after death for use by strangers. In their thoughtful response Fredrick and Ben Kroon lay out practical concerns regarding our proposal. They raise issues regarding the quality of sperm collected postmortem based on empirical studies. Second, they claim that concerns about quality would make women unlikely to use sperm collected after death. In this response we explore issues (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations