Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. What new axioms could not be.Kai Hauser - 2002 - Dialectica 56 (2):109–124.
    The paper exposes the philosophical and mathematical flaws in an attempt to settle the continuum problem by a new class of axioms based on probabilistic reasoning. I also examine the larger proposal behind this approach, namely the introduction of new primitive notions that would supersede the set theoretic foundation of mathematics.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Independence, randomness and the axiom of choice.Michiel van Lambalgen - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1274-1304.
    We investigate various ways of introducing axioms for randomness in set theory. The results show that these axioms, when added to ZF, imply the failure of AC. But the axiom of extensionality plays an essential role in the derivation, and a deeper analysis may ultimately show that randomness is incompatible with extensionality.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • (1 other version)On The Correct Definition of Randomness.Paul Benioff - 1978 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978 (2):62-78.
    The concept of randomness as applied to number sequences is important to the study of the relationship between the foundations of mathematics and physics. A reason is that while randomness is often defined in mathematical-logical terms, the only way one has to generate random number sequences is by means of repetitive physical processes. This paper will examine the question: What definition of randomness is correct in the sense of being the weakest allowable? Why this question is so important will become (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Two notes on the foundations of set‐theory.G. Kreisel - 1969 - Dialectica 23 (2):93-114.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations