Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Money for Nothing: Are Decoupled Agricultural Subsidies Just?Daniel Pilchman - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (6):1105-1125.
    Every year, the US government pays farmers billions of dollars not to grow anything. Especially within urban constituencies, politically and geographically distant from food production centers, these decoupled agriculture subsidies may seem to be unjust uses for public tax dollars. But can any argument be given in favor of such payments? I argue the affirmative by linking decoupled agricultural subsidies to the solution of pressing moral issues: obesity and food deserts. First, I argue that decoupled subsidies offer growers the economic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Creating a governable reality: analysing the use of quantification in shaping Australian wheat marketing policy.Patrick O’Keeffe - 2018 - Agriculture and Human Values 35 (3):553-567.
    This paper analyses Australian policy makers’ use of quantification and technologies of government to implement the project of Australian wheat export market liberalisation. I draw upon policy documents to analyse how quantification has been used to construct a simplified, governable conception of the wheat industry. Policy makers, I suggest, acted upon this constructed reality through assemblages of technologies such as performance objectives, audit, cost-benefit analysis and econometric modelling to facilitate wheat export market deregulation. In addition, this paper shows how quantification (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark