Switch to: References

Citations of:

Converging on an Open Quest

Diacritics 27 (1):17-19 (1997)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Symposium: The Contribution of Laclau’s Discourse Theory to International Relations and International Political Economy: Introduction.Frank A. Stengel & Dirk Nabers - 2019 - New Political Science 41 (2):248-262.
    This symposium explores the value of Poststructuralist (or Political) Discourse Theory (PDT) for the analysis of world politics. PDT was originally developed by the late Argentine political theorist Ernesto Laclau, in early works together with Chantal Mouffe, and has entered the margins of International Relations (IR) in recent years, mainly by bringing in poststructuralist concepts that had previously been ignored by the more critical strands of theorizing. Against this background, the introduction (1) discusses the disconnect between PDT and research on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The hegemony of hegemony.Valentine Jeremy - 2001 - History of the Human Sciences 14 (1):88-104.
    A distinctive characteristic of Laclau and Mouffe’s theory of hegemony is its insistence on the denial of an essence or ground of the subject. This element of their theory is derived from their notion of antagonism, in which a relation with a ground is brought into question by revealing its contingency. This article argues that the political dimension of this argument makes sense only in the context of Laclau and Mouffe’s notion of modernity. However, the universalizing of modernity as the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Opportunity and Impasse:Social Change and the Limits of International Legal Strategy.Lee McConnell - unknown
    A diverse range of actors, from practitioners and academics to civil society groups and activists, appear to see hope in international law for the advancement of their causes. This article examines whether this optimism is well-founded. It explores whether international law can serve as an agent of social change, and whether it can accommodate radical changes in social order. It begins by exposing a formalist stance that is immanent to much ‘legal activist’ discourse. It then explores links between this mode (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark