Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Some Lessons From Simulations of Scientific Disagreements.Dunja Šešelja - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 25):6143-6158.
    This paper examines lessons obtained by means of simulations in the form of agent-based models about the norms that are to guide disagreeing scientists. I focus on two types of epistemic and methodological norms: norms that guide one’s attitude towards one’s own theory, and norms that guide one’s attitude towards the opponent’s theory. Concerning I look into ABMs that have been designed to examine the context of peer disagreement. Here I challenge the conclusion that the given ABMs provide a support (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Is Science Compatible with Religion but Not with Naturalism?: Alvin Plantinga: Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011, Xvi+359pp, $27.95 HB.Hugh Lacey - 2013 - Metascience 22 (2):423-426.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching.Michael R. Matthews (ed.) - 2014 - Springer.
    This inaugural handbook documents the distinctive research field that utilizes history and philosophy in investigation of theoretical, curricular and pedagogical issues in the teaching of science and mathematics. It is contributed to by 130 researchers from 30 countries; it provides a logically structured, fully referenced guide to the ways in which science and mathematics education is, informed by the history and philosophy of these disciplines, as well as by the philosophy of education more generally. The first handbook to cover the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Reducing Pseudoscientific and Paranormal Beliefs in University Students Through a Course in Science and Critical Thinking.James Wilson - 2018 - Science & Education 27 (1-2):183-210.
    This study measured the relationship between student’s religion, gender, and propensity for fantasy thinking with the change in belief for paranormal and pseudoscientific subjects following a science and critical thinking course that directly confronted these subjects. Student pre-course endorsement of religious, paranormal, and pseudoscientific beliefs ranged from 21 to 53%, with religion having the highest endorsement rate. Pre-course belief in paranormal and pseudoscientific subjects was correlated with high scores in some fantasy thinking scales and showed a gender and a religion (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • I Have Chosen Another Way of Thinking.Lena Hansson & Britt Lindahl - 2010 - Science & Education 19 (9):895-918.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • ‘Holding’ and ‘Endorsing’ Claims in the Course of Scientific Activities.Hugh Lacey - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 53:89-95.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Philosophical Issues Related to Risks and Values.Renato Rodrigues Kinouchi - 2018 - Filosofia Unisinos 19 (3).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Interdisciplinarity and Climate Change: Transforming Knowledge and Practice for Our Global Future.Ted Benton - 2013 - Journal of Critical Realism 12 (2):260 - 265.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reflections on Science and Technoscience.Hugh Lacey - 2012 - Scientiae Studia 10 (SPE):103-128.
    Technoscientific research, a kind of scientific research conducted within the decontextualized approach (DA), uses advanced technology to produce instruments, experimental objects, and new objects and structures, that enable us to gain knowledge of states of affairs of novel domains, especially knowledge about new possibilities of what we can do and make, with the horizons of practical, industrial, medical or military innovation, and economic growth and competition, never far removed from view. The legitimacy of technoscientific innovations can be appraised only in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Tecnociência comercialmente orientada ou investigação multiestratégica?Hugh Lacey - 2014 - Scientiae Studia 12 (4):669-695.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The Eagle and the Starlings: Galileo’s Argument for the Autonomy of Science—How Pertinent is It Today?Hugh Lacey & Pablo R. Mariconda - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):122-131.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Scientific Research, Technological Innovation and the Agenda of Social Justice, Democratic Participation and Sustainability.Hugh Lacey - 2014 - Scientiae Studia 12 (SPE):37-55.
    Modern science, whose methodologies give special privilege to using decontextualizing strategies and downplay the role of context-sensitive strategies, have been extraordinarily successful in producing knowledge whose applications have transformed the shape of the lifeworld. Nevertheless, I argue that how the mainstream of the modern scientific tradition interprets the nature and objectives of science is incoherent; and that today there are two competing interpretations of scientific activities that are coherent and that maintain continuity with the success of the tradition: "commercially-oriented technoscience" (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • O lugar da ciência no mundo dos valores e da experiência humana.Hugh Lacey - 2009 - Scientiae Studia 7 (4):681-701.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations