Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why Cognitive Linguistics must embrace the social and pragmatic dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously.Hans-Jörg Schmid - 2016 - Cognitive Linguistics 27 (4):543-557.
    I will argue that the cognitive-linguistic enterprise should step up its efforts to embrace the social and pragmatic dimensions of language. This claim will be derived from a survey of the premises and promise of the cognitive-linguistic approach to the study of language and be defended in more detail on logical and empirical grounds. Key elements of a usage-based emergentist socio-cognitive approach known as Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model (Schmid 2014, 2015) will be presented in order to demonstrate how social and pragmatic aspects (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Evidentiality revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives. [REVIEW]Yi-na Wang & Siqi Lyu - 2017 - Cognitive Linguistics 29 (4):843-852.
    Journal Name: Cognitive Linguistics Issue: Ahead of print.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Diagrammatic iconicity explains asymmetries in Paamese possessive constructions.Simon Devylder - 2018 - Cognitive Linguistics 29 (2):313-348.
    Grammatical asymmetries in possessive constructions are overtly coded in about 18% of the world’s languages according to the World Atlas of Language Structures What primarily motivates these grammatical asymmetries is controversial and has been at the crux of the “iconicity vs. frequency” debate This paper contributes to this debate by focusing on the grammatical asymmetries of Paamese possessive constructions, and looking for the primary motivating factor in their multidimensional experiential context. After a careful account of four experiential dimensions of distance, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • “Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward”.Dagmar Divjak, Natalia Levshina & Jane Klavan - 2016 - Cognitive Linguistics 27 (4):447-463.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Cognitive Linguistics Jahrgang: 27 Heft: 4 Seiten: 447-463.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Typology and the future of Cognitive Linguistics.William Croft - 2016 - Cognitive Linguistics 27 (4):587-602.
    The relationship between typology and Cognitive Linguistics was first posed in the 1980s, in terms of the relationship between Greenbergian universals and the knowledge of the individual speaker. An answer to this question emerges from understanding the role of linguistic variation in language, from occasions of language use to typological diversity. This in turn requires the contribution of discourse analysis, sociolinguistics, and evolutionary historical linguistics as well as typology and Cognitive Linguistics. While Cognitive Linguistics is part of this enterprise, a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • Explaining uncertainty and defectivity of inflectional paradigms.Neil Bermel & Alexandre Nikolaev - 2022 - Cognitive Linguistics 33 (3):585-621.
    The current study investigates how native speakers of a morphologically complex language handle uncertainty related to linguistic forms that have gaps in their inflectional paradigms. We analyze their strategies of dealing with paradigmatic defectivity and how these strategies are motivated by subjective contemporaneousness, frequency, acceptability, and other lexical and structural characteristics of words. We administered a verb production task with Finnish native speakers using verbs from a small non-productive inflectional type that has many paradigmatic gaps and asked participants to inflect (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation