Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Separating stationary reflection principles.Paul Larson - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):247-258.
    We present a variety of (ω 1 ,∞)-distributive forcings which when applied to models of Martin's Maximum separate certain well known reflection principles. In particular, we do this for the reflection principles SR, SR α (α ≤ ω 1 ), and SRP.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Martin’s Maximum and definability in H.Paul B. Larson - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 156 (1):110-122.
    In [P. Larson, Martin’s Maximum and the axiom , Ann. Pure App. Logic 106 135–149], we modified a coding device from [W.H. Woodin, The Axiom of Determinacy, Forcing Axioms, and the Nonstationary Ideal, Walter de Gruyter & Co, Berlin, 1999] and the consistency proof of Martin’s Maximum from [M. Foreman, M. Magidor, S. Shelah, Martin’s Maximum. saturated ideals, and non-regular ultrafilters. Part I, Annal. Math. 127 1–47] to show that from a supercompact limit of supercompact cardinals one could force Martin’s (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Kurepa trees and Namba forcing.Bernhard König & Yasuo Yoshinobu - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (4):1281-1290.
    We show that strongly compact cardinals and MM are sensitive to $\lambda$-closed forcings for arbitrarily large $\lambda$. This is done by adding ‘regressive' $\lambda$-Kurepa trees in either case. We argue that the destruction of regressive Kurepa trees requires a non-standard application of MM. As a corollary, we find a consistent example of an $\omega_2$-closed poset that is not forcing equivalent to any $\omega_2$-directed-closed poset.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (1 other version)On a convenient property about $${[\gamma]^{\aleph_0}}$$.David Asperó - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (7):653-677.
    Several situations are presented in which there is an ordinal γ such that ${\{ X \in [\gamma]^{\aleph_0} : X \cap \omega_1 \in S\,{\rm and}\, ot(X) \in T \}}$ is a stationary subset of ${[\gamma]^{\aleph_0}}$ for all stationary ${S, T\subseteq \omega_1}$ . A natural strengthening of the existence of an ordinal γ for which the above conclusion holds lies, in terms of consistency strength, between the existence of the sharp of ${H_{\omega_2}}$ and the existence of sharps for all reals. Also, an (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark