Switch to: References

Citations of:

International ethics codes and the duty to protect

In James L. Werth, Elizabeth Reynolds Welfel & G. Andrew H. Benjamin (eds.), The Duty to Protect: Ethical, Legal, and Professional Considerations for Mental Health Professionals. American Psychological Association (2009)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A Cross-Sectional Examination of International Competency Standards.Patty Kuo & Mark M. Leach - 2017 - Ethics and Behavior 27 (7):562-581.
    The evaluation of competency in the field of psychology has gained international attention in recent years. Focusing on international competencies can promote high standards of care and identify common values of the profession. However, there is little research regarding international perceptions of competency. Examining ethics codes from different countries can highlight international standards of competent practice, as ethics codes outline professional expectations of the field. The current study compared the ethics standards found in 47 codes of ethics representing 51 countries. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Displaying Ethical Behaviors by Psychologists When Standards Are Unclear.Thomas Oakland & Mark M. Leach - 2010 - Ethics and Behavior 20 (3-4):197-206.
    Psychologists recognize the need to know and adhere to the ethics code in the country or countries in which they work. However, most countries do not have ethics codes that govern the work of psychologists. Thus, psychologists working in countries that do not have an ethics code face a dilemma: They need to behave ethically yet do not know the guidelines or standards that govern these behaviors. This article highlights some cross-national conditions about which psychologists should be aware when working (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation