Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Debating Eukaryogenesis—Part 2: How Anachronistic Reasoning Can Lure Us into Inventing Intermediates.Dave Speijer - 2020 - Bioessays 42 (5):1900153.
    Eukaryotic origins are inextricably linked with the arrival of a pre‐mitochondrion of alphaproteobacterial‐like ancestry. However, the nature of the “host” cell and the mode of entry are subject to heavy debate. It is becoming clear that the mutual adaptation of a relatively simple, archaeal host and the endosymbiont has been the defining influence at the beginning of the eukaryotic lineage; however, many still resist such symbiogenic models. In part 1, it is posited that a symbiotic stage before uptake (“pre‐symbiosis”) seems (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Inferring the Evolutionary History of Your Favorite Protein: A Guide for Molecular Biologists.Jolien J. E. Hooff, Eelco Tromer, Teunis J. P. Dam, Geert J. P. L. Kops & Berend Snel - 2019 - Bioessays 41 (5):1900006.
    Comparative genomics has proven a fruitful approach to acquire many functional and evolutionary insights into core cellular processes. Here it is argued that in order to perform accurate and interesting comparative genomics, one first and foremost has to be able to recognize, postulate, and revise different evolutionary scenarios. After all, these studies lack a simple protocol, due to different proteins having different evolutionary dynamics and demanding different approaches. The authors here discuss this challenge from a practical (what are the observations?) (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark