Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why study deduction?Kathleen M. Galotti & Lloyd K. Komatsu - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):350-350.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mental-model theory and rationality.Pascal Engel - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):345-345.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • On rules, models and understanding.Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):345-346.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • On modes of explanation.Rachel Joffe Falmagne - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):346-347.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The argument for mental models is unsound.James H. Fetzer - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):347-348.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Some difficulties about deduction.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):341-342.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Tractability considerations in deduction.James M. Crawford - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):343-343.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Deduction by children and animals: Does it follow the Johnson-Laird & Byrne model?Hank Davis - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):344-344.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Everyday reasoning and logical inference.Jon Barwise - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):337-338.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Mental models cannot exclude mental logic and make little sense without it.Martin D. S. Braine - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):338-339.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Mental models and nonmonotonic reasoning.Nick Chater - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):340-341.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Getting down to cases.Kent Bach - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):334-336.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Deduction as an example of thinking.Jonathan Baron - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):336-337.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Toward a developmental theory of mental models.Bruno G. Bara - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):336-336.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mental models and tableau logic.Avery D. Andrews - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):334-334.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Model theory of deduction: a unified computational approach.Bruno G. Bara, Monica Bucciarelli & Vincenzo Lombardo - 2001 - Cognitive Science 25 (6):839-901.
    One of the most debated questions in psychology and cognitive science is the nature and the functioning of the mental processes involved in deductive reasoning. However, all existing theories refer to a specific deductive domain, like syllogistic, propositional or relational reasoning.Our goal is to unify the main types of deductive reasoning into a single set of basic procedures. In particular, we bring together the microtheories developed from a mental models perspective in a single theory, for which we provide a formal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Visualizing the possibilities.Bruce J. MacLennan - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):356-357.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Probabilistic factors in deontic reasoning.K. I. Manktelow, E. J. Sutherland & D. E. Over - 1995 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (3):201 – 219.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Hempel's paradox and Wason's selection task: Logical and psychological puzzles of confirmation.Raymond S. Nickerson - 1996 - Thinking and Reasoning 2 (1):1 – 31.
    Hempel's paradox of the ravens has to do with the question of what constitutes confirmation from a logical point of view; Wason 's selection task has been used extensively to investigate how people go about attempting to confirm or disconfirm conditional claims. This paper presents an argument that the paradox is resolved, and that people's typical performance in the selection task can be explained, by consideration of what constitutes an effective strategy for seeking evidence of the tenability of universal or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Focusing in Wason's selection task: Content and instruction effects.Roberta E. Love & Claudius M. Kessler - 1995 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (2):153 – 182.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • The locus of facilitation in the abstract selection task.David W. Green & Rodney Larking - 1995 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (2):183 – 199.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Introduction.Paolo Legrenzi - 1994 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (1):3.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reply to the commentators on a model theory of induction.Philip N. Johnson‐Laird - 1994 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (1):73 – 96.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Phenomenology-friendly neuroscience: The return to Merleau-ponty as psychologist.Ralph D. Ellis - 2006 - Human Studies 29 (1):33 - 55.
    This paper reports on the Kuhnian revolution now occurring in neuropsychology that is finally supportive of and friendly to phenomenology – the “enactive” approach to the mind-body relation, grounded in the notion of self-organization, which is consistent with Husserl and Merleau-Ponty on virtually every point. According to the enactive approach, human minds understand the world by virtue of the ways our bodies can act relative to it, or the ways we can imagine acting. This requires that action be distinguished from (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation