Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Liberalism, state, and community.Peter Simpson - 1994 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 8 (2):159-173.
    Arguments for and against liberalism are vitiated by failing to distinguish between states (which have millions of citizens) and communities (which have only a few thousand citizens). The state should be liberal or minimal, but the community should not. The state is an alliance of communities for mutual defense and is concerned with matters of defense alone. Two reasons are given for this conclusion, one from Aristotle and one from Hobbes (though Hobbes's argument has to be corrected in two important (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Liberalism in Poland: What is left?Miłowit Kuninski - 1997 - Studies in East European Thought 49 (4):241-257.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Libertarianism vs. community: Reply to Simpson.Ryszard Legutko - 1995 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 9 (3):421-425.
    Like many libertarian thinkers, Simpson assumes that the minimal state is culturally neutral. This is false. Libertarianism is a theory opposed to hierarchy at the state level. As such, it also undermines the grounds for hierarchy at the community level. Since communities require some form of hierarchy not only to exist but to generate meaningful culture, libertarianism is inherently nonneutral towards culture. From this it follows that Simpson's idea of a minimal state overseeing various nonliberal communities cannot be realized within (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation