Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Hybridised materialisms: The ‘twists and turns’ of materialities in feminist theory.Najate Zouggari - 2019 - Feminist Theory 20 (3):269-281.
    This article examines the conceptualisation of materialities in feminist theory through two paradigmatic examples: (French) materialist feminism and new materialisms. What can be interpreted as an opposition between different paradigms can also be disrupted as long as we define what matters as a relation or a process rather than a substance or a lost paradise to which we should return. New materialisms indeed help to investigate aspects such as corporeality, human/non-human interaction and textures, but the role of feminist materialism is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Multispecies life in the ruins.Jenny Jarlsdotter Wikström - 2017 - Angelaki 22 (2):233-237.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Responsibility of Men for the Oppression of Women.Raymond S. Pfeiffer - 1985 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 2 (2):217-229.
    There can be little sense to claims that living men are responsible for the oppression of women in the past, or that men who have not oppressed women still bear responsibility for such oppression.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Male readings of feminist theory: The psychologization of sexual politics in the masculinity literature. [REVIEW]Anthony McMahon - 1993 - Theory and Society 22 (5):675-695.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Feminist Technologies and Post-Capitalism: Defining and Reflecting Upon Xenofeminism.Emily Jones - 2019 - Feminist Review 123 (1):126-134.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Marx and the Concept of Historical Time.George Tomlinson - 2015 - Dissertation, Kingston University
    The guiding premise of this thesis is that the concept of historical time constitutes a distinct philosophical problem for Karl Marx’s work. Marx does not examine the relationship between time and history in his work, rendering the historicist framework of linear, progressive time the overriding framework through which he understands this relationship. However, the larger problem is that, despite this lack, the philosophical originality and critical function of Marx’s work is in no small measure defined by the contribution it makes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark