Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Socratic fallacy undone.Dylan B. Futter - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (6):1071-1091.
    ABSTRACTThe Socratic fallacy is the supposed mistake of inferring that somebody does not know any instances or attributes of a universal because of their inability to give a satisfactory definition...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Chapter Three.Paul Woodruff - 1987 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 3 (1):79-115.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Reexamining the "examined life" in Plato's apology of socrates.Harvey S. Goldman - 2004 - Philosophical Forum 35 (1):1–33.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Transmitting and Innovating in Confucius: Analects 7:1.Jiyuan Yu - 2012 - Asian Philosophy 22 (4):375-386.
    Although the saying at Analects 7:1 is well-known and often mentioned in Confucian scholarship, there have been few focused discussions about what ‘transmitting’ means and in what sense it is contrasted to ‘innovating’. This article seeks to argue for the following points. The ‘transmitting/innovating’ relationship should be understood in relation to the Confucian notion of filial piety. Analects 7: 1 is indeed Confucius's self-conception of what he is doing, that is, his way of philosophizing. Traditionally, Confucius's transmitting has been thought (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reexamining the “Examined Life” in Plato’s Apology of Socrates.Harvey S. Goldman - 2004 - Philosophical Forum 35 (1):1-33.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Les paradoxes de l’acatalepsie : saisie, non-saisie, et insaisissabilité dans les traditions académiciennes et sceptiques.Enzo Godinot - 2024 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 122 (2):185-203.
    Cet article analyse les différents paradoxes associés aux usages académiciens et sceptiques des concepts de saisie [ katalepsis ], d’insaisissabilité [ akatalèpsia ] et d’absence de saisie lors d’une représentation [ akatalèptos ]. Il s’agit de montrer, que les philosophies déniant aux dogmatiques leur prétention à saisir fermement quelque chose de certain ne se contredisent pas nécessairement en prétendant saisir l’insaisissable ou en universalisant l’insaisissabilité. Évitant les paradoxes infamants auxquels leurs adversaires cherchent à les réduire (que nous nommerons « paradoxe (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark