Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Explanation in the Social Sciences: Singular Explanation and the Social Sciences.David-Hillel Ruben - 1990 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 27:95-117.
    Are explanations in the social sciences fundamentally different from explanations in the natural sciences? Many philosophers think that they are, and I call such philosophers ‘difference theorists’. Many difference theorists locate that difference in the alleged fact that only in the natural sciences does explanation essentially include laws.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A paradigm for research in education.Börje Holmberg - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 16 (1):19–33.
    Börje Holmberg; A Paradigm for Research in Education, Journal of Philosophy of Education, Volume 16, Issue 1, 30 May 2006, Pages 19–33, https://doi.org/10.1111/.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Two-Variable and Three-Variable Functional Explanations.Peter Halfpenny - 1981 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 (1):27-32.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Science et résolution de problème: Liens, difficultés et voies de dépassement dans le champ Des sciences de l'administration.Michel Audet, Maurice Landry & Richard Déry - 1986 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16 (4):409-440.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Functionalism, causation and explanation.Hugh V. Mclachlan - 1976 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 6 (3):235-240.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Functional explanation and the linguistic analogy.Philippe Van Parijs - 1979 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (4):425-443.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Relativism, reality and philosophy.John Horton - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (1):19-36.
    This article explores Peter Winch’s account of the relationship between language and reality. It defends Winch against some common misunderstandings of his views but identifies two problematic areas. The first concerns the internal coherence of his account of philosophy. The second relates to the issue of rejecting particular ways of life or cultural practices as erroneous or illusory. One source of these problems is a tension between Winch’s official conception of philosophy and his own commitment to ‘defending’ the plurality of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations