Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Scoring, Truthlikeness, and Value.Igor Douven - forthcoming - Synthese:1-18.
    There is an ongoing debate about which rule we ought to use for scoring probability estimates. Much of this debate has been premised on scoring-rule monism, according to which there is exactly one best scoring rule. In previous work, I have argued against this position. The argument given there was based on purely a priori considerations, notably the intuition that scoring rules should be sensitive to truthlikeness relations if, and only if, such relations are present among whichever hypotheses are at (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Accuracy and Verisimilitude: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly.Miriam Schoenfield - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:000-000.
    It seems like we care about at least two features of our credence function: gradational-accuracy and verisimilitude. Accuracy-first epistemology requires that we care about one feature of our credence function: gradational-accuracy. So if you want to be a verisimilitude-valuing accuracy-firster, you must be able to think of the value of verisimilitude as somehow built into the value of gradational-accuracy. Can this be done? In a recent article, Oddie has argued that it cannot, at least if we want the accuracy measure (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Headaches for Epistemologists.Brian Talbot - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, EarlyView.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark