Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Revisiting truth and freedom in Orwell and Rorty.Marcus Morgan - 2015 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (8):853-865.
    This article uses differing interpretations of a thread of narrative taken from Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four as a springboard to exploring the connection between philosophical truth and political liberalism. It argues that while no positive connection exists between realist truth and political liberalism, minimal negative connections do exist between Rorty’s humanistic account of truth and a basic commitment to democratic and liberal frameworks. It sees these minimal connections as limiting in their failure to provide a politics that moves beyond an exclusive (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Realidade e Resistência: Habermas e Haslanger sobre objetividade, crítica social e a possibilidade de mudança. Tradução de Felipe Gonçalves Silva.Federica Gregoratto - 2022 - Dois Pontos 18 (2).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • From Normative Spheres to Normative Practices: New Prospects for Normative Theory after Habermas.Roberto Frega - 2013 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (5):680-712.
    In this paper I argue against Jürgen Habermas’s theoretical dualism between ethics and morality. I do this by showing how his account of normativity is vitiated by an unnecessary superposition of a social-evolutionary and a theoretical-linguistic account of normativity, and that this brings about theoretical problems that in the end cannot be overcome. I also show that Rainer Forst’s attempt at salvaging Habermas’s distinction is equally doomed to failure, but that his attempt nevertheless invites new and more fruitful avenues for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls–Habermas Debate.Jørgen Pedersen - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):399-432.
    The Rawls–Habermas debate is having a revival. In this article I argue that both philosophers develop different freestanding conceptions of political legitimacy, and show how they diverge when it comes to how political legitimacy can be justified. Habermas is looking for a deeper justification than Rawls will allow for. I then proceed to show how the different meta-ethical positions yield two different versions of democratic theory, focusing in particular on rights and popular sovereignty. I demonstrate how both conceive of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A Janus-faced Approach to Learning. A Critical Discussion of Habermas' Pragmatic Approach.Salvatore Italia - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (2):443-460.
    A realist approach to learning is what I propose here. This is based on a non-epistemic dimension whose presence is a necessary assumption for a concept of learning of a life-world as complementary to learning within a life-world. I develop my approach in opposition to Jürgen Habermas' pragmatic approach, which seems to lack of something from a realist point of view.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Works Cited.[author unknown] - 2020 - In María Del Del Rosario Acosta López & Colin McQuillan (eds.), Critique in German Philosophy: From Kant to Critical Theory. Albany: SUNY Press. pp. 395-414.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On Habermas’s differentiation of rightness from truth: Can an achievement concept do without a validity concept?Piet Strydom - 2018 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (5):555-574.
    The metaproblematic of this article is the cognitive structure of morality. In the context of an investigation into Habermas’s theory of validity which respects his strong cognitivism and emphasis...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark