Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Famine, Affluence, and Philosophers’ Biases.Peter Seipel - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (10):2907-2926.
    Moral relativists often defend their view as an inference to the best explanation of widespread and deep moral disagreement. Many philosophers have challenged this line of reasoning in recent years, arguing that moral objectivism provides us with ample resources to develop an equally or more plausible method of explanation. One of the most promising of these objectivist methods is what I call the self-interest explanation, the view that intractable moral diversity is due to the distorting effects of our interests. In (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Critical Notice.Robert Hanna - 1998 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):453-470.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations