Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Page, text and screen in the university: Revisiting the Illich hypothesis.Lavinia Marin, Jan Masschelein & Maarten Simons - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (1):49-60.
    In the age of web 2.0, the university is constantly challenged to re-adapt its ‘old-fashioned’ pedagogies to the new possibilities opened up by digital technologies. This article proposes a rethinking of the relation between university and (digital) technologies by focusing not on how technologies function in the university, but on their constituting a meta-condition for the existence of the university pedagogy of inquiry. Following Ivan Illich’s idea that textual technologies played a crucial role in the inception of the university, we (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Digitisation, securitisation, and upbringing: interrelations and emerging questions.Naomi Hodgson & Stefan Ramaekers - 2020 - Ethics and Education 15 (4):391-412.
    ABSTRACT In recent years a tightening of safeguarding legislation and protocols that overlap with anti-terror legislation have given particular shape to discourses and practices of risk management and early intervention, particularly in early childhood education and parenting. Such developments have taken place in a context in which digital technology has become ubiquitous, enabling the role of surveillance in modes of governing to take on new forms. Here as well as giving an overview of literature on the digital in general, we (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Negen-u-topic becoming: On the reinvention of youth.Joff P. N. Bradley - 2020 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (4):443-454.
    At first glance a Russian anarchist’s revolutionary address to the youth of his day made in the late 19th century and the address to youth made by a contemporary French philosopher may appear to have little in common as their context and era are ostensibly very different. How would Petr Kropotkin’s address be understood in our time? Are Kropotkin’s concerns the same as those raised by Bernard Stiegler? Could Kropotkin speak of universal concerns, a sense of elevation and sublimation not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations