Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Classical Form or Modern Scientific Rationalization? Nietzsche on the Drive to Ordered Thought as Apollonian Power and Socratic Pathology.Eli I. Lichtenstein - 2021 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 52 (1):105-134.
    Nietzsche sometimes praises the drive to order—to simplify, organize, and draw clear boundaries—as expressive of a vital "classical" style, or an Apollonian artistic drive to calmly contemplate forms displaying "epic definiteness and clarity." But he also sometimes harshly criticizes order, as in the pathological dialectics or "logical schematism" that he associates paradigmatically with Socrates. I challenge a tradition that interprets Socratism as an especially one-sided expression of, or restricted form of attention to, the Apollonian: they are more radically disparate. Beyond (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reconsidering the will to power in Heidegger's ‘Nietzsche’.Catherine F. Botha - 2016 - South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):111-120.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Does Nietzsche have a “Nachlass”?William A. B. Parkhurst - 2020 - Nietzsche Studien 49 (1):216-257.
    Based on a review of the literature and historical evidence, I argue that the use of the methodological principle known as the priority principle in Anglo-American Nietzsche scholarship is inconsistent and irreconcilable with historical evidence. It attempts to demarcate between the published works and the Nachlass. However, there are no agreed upon necessary and sufficient conditions of a particular textual object being considered “Nachlass.” This absence leads to implicit and often tacit value demarcation criteria that can be broadly grouped into (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Will to Power as Alternative to Causality.Joshua Rayman - 2016 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 30 (3):361-372.
    Nietzsche’s critique of causality has not been taken as seriously as it should be. Nietzschean naturalists such as Ken Gemes, Brian Leiter, and John Richardson carry on with their appeals to causal-scientific forms of explanation as if there were no such critique.1 For instance, Leiter claims that Nietzsche is a naturalist in that he sets forth “theories that explain various important human phenomena … [in scientific terms], but are also modeled on science in the sense that they seek to reveal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation