Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A note on extensions of infinitary logic.Saharon Shelah & Jouko Väänänen - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (1):63-69.
    We show that a strong form of the so called Lindström’s Theorem [4] fails to generalize to extensions of L κ ω and L κ κ : For weakly compact κ there is no strongest extension of L κ ω with the (κ,κ)-compactness property and the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem down to κ. With an additional set-theoretic assumption, there is no strongest extension of L κ κ with the (κ,κ)-compactness property and the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem down to <κ.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Ultrafilter translations.Paolo Lipparini - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (2):63-87.
    We develop a method for extending results about ultrafilters into a more general setting. In this paper we shall be mainly concerned with applications to cardinality logics. For example, assumingV=L, Gödel's Axiom of Constructibility, we prove that if λ > ωα then the logic with the quantifier “there existα many” is (λ,λ)-compact if and only if either λ is weakly compact or λ is singular of cofinality<ωα. As a corollary, for every infinite cardinals λ and μ, there exists a (λ,λ)-compact (...))
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • More on regular and decomposable ultrafilters in ZFC.Paolo Lipparini - 2010 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (4):340-374.
    We prove, in ZFC alone, some new results on regularity and decomposability of ultrafilters; among them: If m ≥ 1 and the ultrafilter D is , equation imagem)-regular, then D is κ -decomposable for some κ with λ ≤ κ ≤ 2λ ). If λ is a strong limit cardinal and D is , equation imagem)-regular, then either D is -regular or there are arbitrarily large κ < λ for which D is κ -decomposable ). Suppose that λ is singular, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation