Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Reciprocity in Firm–Stakeholder Dialog: Timeliness, Valence, Richness, and Topicality.Lite J. Nartey, Witold J. Henisz & Sinziana Dorobantu - 2023 - Journal of Business Ethics 183 (2):429-451.
    Scholars of stakeholder management have long grappled with the question of how to communicate with stakeholders to enhance cooperation and reduce conflict. We build on insights from the literature on stakeholder dialog to highlight the importance of four elements of firm–stakeholder dialog processes: timing, valence, richness, and topicality of firms’ responses to stakeholder engagements. We demonstrate a link between these elements of the firm–stakeholder dialog process and changes in stakeholder cooperation or conflict with the firm, as well as contingent tradeoffs (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The movement for reforming american business ethics: A twenty-year perspective. [REVIEW]Simcha B. Werner - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (1):61-70.
    This paper presents a succinct review of the movement for moral genesis in business that arose in the 1970s. The moral genesis movement is characterized by: the rejection of the premise that business and ethics are antagonistic; the rise of the Issues Management approach, which stresses the social responsibility of the corporation: disdain of government regulation as a means of business moralization, and a search for control measures aimed at improving organization moral behavior. This movement now begins to give rise (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Managers in the Moral Dimension: What Etzioni Might Mean to Corporate Managers.Bill Shaw & Frances E. Zollers - 1993 - Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (2):153-168.
    InThe Moral Dimension, Amitai Etzioni critiques the neoclassical economic paradigm (NEP), a model built upon ethical egoism and which equates rationality (the logical/empirical domain) with the maximization of preferences by self-interested economic units. Etzioni finds the NEP’s exclusion of the moral/affective domain to be a glaring failure and, because of this omission, he claims that the economic model is not capable of achieving its design functions: prediction and explanation. Etzioni introduces a socio-economic model, the I & We paradigm, in which (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Managers in the Moral Dimension: What Etzioni Might Mean to Corporate Managers.Bill Shaw & Frances E. Zollers - 1993 - Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (2):153-168.
    InThe Moral Dimension, Amitai Etzioni critiques the neoclassical economic paradigm (NEP), a model built upon ethical egoism and which equates rationality (the logical/empirical domain) with the maximization of preferences by self-interested economic units. Etzioni finds the NEP’s exclusion of the moral/affective domain to be a glaring failure and, because of this omission, he claims that the economic model is not capable of achieving its design functions: prediction and explanation. Etzioni introduces a socio-economic model, the I & We paradigm, in which (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations