Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Heterodox Economics, Social Ethics, and Inequalities.Christina McRorie - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (2):232-258.
    Research in the cognitive sciences indicates that metaphors significantly shape perceptions and approaches to problem solving. With this in mind, this essay argues that it is problematic for ethicists that mainstream economics and other social scientific literature relies on naturalistic metaphors to describe markets. These imply an inaccurate picture of economic phenomena and rhetorically frame many solutions to problems such as inequality as interventionist. This essay proposes that religious ethicists may find resources for avoiding this conceptual hazard in emerging fields (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Benefit Cap and the Complexity of Discrimination: R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions.Laura Lammasniemi - 2016 - Feminist Legal Studies 24 (2):215-221.
    In R [on the application of SG and others (previously JS and others)] v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, the United Kingdom Supreme Court evaluated the legality of the benefit cap. The Court was sharply divided but decided by a narrow margin that the benefit cap did not amount to a violation of the claimants’ human rights. While the majority accepted that the gender discrimination was justified, the Court noted that the current measures fell short of the United (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation