Switch to: References

Citations of:

Conceptual Art Is Not What It Seems

In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and conceptual art. New York: Oxford University Press (2007)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. What 4′33″ Is.Julian Dodd - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (4):629-641.
    ABSTRACTWhat is John Cage's 4′33″? This paper disambiguates this question into three sub-questions concerning, respectively, the work's ontological nature, the art form to which it belongs, and the genre it is in. We shall see that the work's performances consist of silence, that it is a work of performance art, and that it belongs to the genre of conceptual art. Seeing the work in these ways helps us to understand it better, and promises to assuage somewhat the puzzlement and irritation (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Four Arts of Photography.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2015 - Wiley.
    Four Arts of Photography explores the history of photography through the lens of philosophy and proposes a new understanding of the art form for the 21st century.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • How to frame edible art.Adam Andrzejewski - 2018 - Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 27 (55-56):82-97.
    The question of whether food is art depends primarily on the definition of art that we agree to accept. The article proposes a model that helps us to focus our mind on what could be, and how we should understand the art of food, if we accept, having applied a fairly liberal theory of art, that food can actually be art. It is argued that there are no methodological or factual constraints indicating that food could not, under some circumstances, be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark