Switch to: References

Citations of:

Дерзание духа

Aleksei Fedorovich Losev

(1988)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

(35 other versions)Методологічні проблеми вивчення філософії освіти.Олена Кіндратець - 2015 - Гуманітарний Вісник Запорізької Державної Інженерної Академії 65:202-211.details The article is concerned with the methodological problems of philosophy of education. The author argues that the philosophy of education belongs to the field of interdisciplinary study at the intersection of philosophy, pedagogy and practical education. The subjects of philosophy of education are: solving a complex epistemological, philosophical and anthropological, cultural, ethical and other problems in general, and the search for a theoretical education development strategy, defining its purpose and value basis, the principles of formation of the content of education (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 6 citations
Time as image of eternity: A.F. Losev’s criticism of subjectivist conceptions of time.Giorgia Rimondi - 2021 - Studies in East European Thought 74 (3):387-400.details The paper analyses Aleksei F. Losev’s position in respect to the notion of time, which he considers in a dialectical perspective. The Russian philosopher proceeds from the Platonic interpretation of the relationship between the one and the many, according to which each plurality carries in itself a unifying principle, as its ontological grounding. This anti-modern perspective represents a rejection of the positivist “objectification” of the world, which introduced the “metaphysical” notions of absolute space and time. According to Losev, time as (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
Мімезис: Антропокультурний вимір подвоєння.Taras Lyuty - 2020 - Наукові Записки Наукма. Філософія Та Релігієзнавство 5:3-14.details The article deals with the historical, cultural and anthropological aspects of the notion of mimesis. It is often considered to be an aesthetic phenomenon and a signified imitation or a doubling. However, such simplification cannot be justified in all instances. Something is always lost when trying to reduce mimesis to simple mechanical imitation. In antiquity, mimesis was not confined to aesthetics but acquired anthropological significance and had an impact on social or pedagogical processes. In this study, mimesis plays, primarily, an (...) Download Export citation Bookmark

1