Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Treating Real People: Science and Humanity.Michael Loughlin, Mathew Mercuri, Alexandra Parvan, Samantha Copeland, Mark Tonelli & Stephen Buetow - 2018 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 24 (5):919-929.
    Something important is happening in applied, interdisciplinary research, particularly in the field of applied health research. The vast array of papers in this edition are evidence of a broad change in thinking across an impressive range of practice and academic areas. The problems of complexity, the rise of chronic conditions, over-diagnosis, co- and multimorbidity are serious and challenging, but we are rising to that challenge. Key conceptions regarding science, evidence, disease, clinical judgement, health and social care, are being revised and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Person Centered Care: Advanced Philosophical Perspectives.Michael Loughlin - unknown
    The ideas and terminology of person-centred care have been part of health discourse for a very long time. Arguments that in healthcare one treats the whole person, not her/his component parts, date back at least to antiquity and the need to treat the patient as a person is articulated persuasively by clinical authors in the early twentieth century. Yet it is only in recent years that we have seen a growing consensus in health policy and practice literature that PCC, and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Patients and Agents – or Why We Need a Different Narrative: A Philosophical Analysis.Harald Walach & Michael Loughlin - 2018 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 13 (1):13.
    The success of medicine in the treatment of patients brings with it new challenges. More people live on to suffer from functional, chronic or multifactorial diseases, and this has led to calls for more complex analyses of the causal determinants of health and illness. Philosophical analysis of background assumptions of the current paradigmatic model. While these factors do not require a radical paradigm shift, they do give us cause to develop a new narrative, to add to existing narratives that frame (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Reasoning, Evidence, and Clinical Decision-Making: The Great Debate Moves Forward.Michael Loughlin, Robyn Bluhm, Stephen Buetow, Kirstin Borgerson & Jonathan Fuller - 2017 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 23 (5):905-914.
    When the editorial to the first philosophy thematic edition of this journal was published in 2010, critical questioning of underlying assumptions, regarding such crucial issues as clinical decision making, practical reasoning, and the nature of evidence in health care, was still derided by some prominent contributors to the literature on medical practice. Things have changed dramatically. Far from being derided or dismissed as a distraction from practical concerns, the discussion of such fundamental questions, and their implications for matters of practical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations