Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Treating Real People: Science and Humanity.Michael Loughlin, Mathew Mercuri, Alexandra Parvan, Samantha Copeland, Mark Tonelli & Stephen Buetow - 2018 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 24 (5):919-929.
    Something important is happening in applied, interdisciplinary research, particularly in the field of applied health research. The vast array of papers in this edition are evidence of a broad change in thinking across an impressive range of practice and academic areas. The problems of complexity, the rise of chronic conditions, over-diagnosis, co- and multimorbidity are serious and challenging, but we are rising to that challenge. Key conceptions regarding science, evidence, disease, clinical judgement, health and social care, are being revised and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Reasoning, Evidence, and Clinical Decision-Making: The Great Debate Moves Forward.Michael Loughlin, Robyn Bluhm, Stephen Buetow, Kirstin Borgerson & Jonathan Fuller - 2017 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 23 (5):905-914.
    When the editorial to the first philosophy thematic edition of this journal was published in 2010, critical questioning of underlying assumptions, regarding such crucial issues as clinical decision making, practical reasoning, and the nature of evidence in health care, was still derided by some prominent contributors to the literature on medical practice. Things have changed dramatically. Far from being derided or dismissed as a distraction from practical concerns, the discussion of such fundamental questions, and their implications for matters of practical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Theory, Experience and Practice.Michael Loughlin, Jonathan Fuller, Robyn Bluhm, Stephen Buetow & Kirstin Borgerson - 2016 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 22 (4):459-465.
    Despite its potential hazards, the activity of questioning theoretical frameworks and and proposing solutions is necessary if progress is even to be possible. Intellectual history has by no means ended so we cannot expect to have all the answers, and from time to time the activity of critical questioning will be frustrating. But intellectual progress requires us to continue the process of asking fundamental questions. The alternative to thinking in this way is indeed unthinkable.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Just How Wide Should ‘Wide Reading’ Be?Martin Lipscomb - 2015 - Nursing Philosophy 16 (4):187-202.
    Educationalists introduce students to literature search strategies that,with rare exceptions, focus chiefly on the location of primary research reports and systematic reviews of those reports. These sources are, however, unlikely to adequately address the normative and/or metaphysical questions that nurses frequently and legitimately interest themselves in. To meet these interests, non-research texts exploring normative and/or metaphysical topics might and perhaps should, in some situations, be deemed suitable search targets. This seems plausible and, moreover, students are encouraged to ‘read widely’. Yet (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Research Report Appraisal: How Much Understanding is Enough?Martin Lipscomb - 2014 - Nursing Philosophy 15 (3):157-170.
    When appraising research papers, how much understanding is enough? More specifically, in deciding whether research results can inform practice, do appraisers need to substantively understand how findings are derived or is it sufficient simply to grasp that suitable analytic techniques were chosen and used by researchers? The degree or depth of understanding that research appraisers need to attain before findings can legitimately/sensibly inform practice is underexplored. In this paper it is argued that, where knowledge/justified beliefs derived from research evidence prompt (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Interactions Between Persons—Knowledge, Decision Making, and the Co‐Production of Practice.Michael Loughlin, Stephen Buetow, Michael Cournoyea, Samantha Marie Copeland, Benjamin Chin-Yee & K. W. M. Fulford - 2019 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 25 (6):911-920.
    There is now broad agreement that ideas like person-centred care, patient expertise and shared decision-making are no longer peripheral to health discourse, fine ideals or merely desirable additions to sound, scientific clinical practice. Rather, their incorporation into our thinking and planning of health and social care is essential if we are to respond adequately to the problems that confront us: they need to be seen not as “ethical add-ons” but core components of any genuinely integrated, realistic and conceptually sound account (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Author Response to “Letter to Editor by Roger Mepsted”.Julie Vaughan-Graham & Cheryl Cott - 2017 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 23 (5):1125-1126.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Phronesis: Practical Wisdom the Role of Professional Practice Knowledge in the Clinical Reasoning of Bobath Instructors.Julie Vaughan-Graham & Cheryl Cott - 2017 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 23 (5):935-948.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Philosophy, Medicine and Health Care – Where We Have Come From and Where We Are Going.Michael Loughlin, Robyn Bluhm, Jonathan Fuller, Stephen Buetow, Ross E. G. Upshur, Kirstin Borgerson, Maya J. Goldenberg & Elselijn Kingma - 2014 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 20 (6):902-907.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Explanation, Understanding, Objectivity and Experience.Michael Loughlin, Robyn Bluhm, Drozdstoj S. Stoyanov, Stephen Buetow, Ross E. G. Upshur, Kirstin Borgerson, Maya J. Goldenberg & Elselijn Kingma - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):415-421.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Uncovering Values‐Based Practice: VBP's Implicit Commitments to Subjectivism and Relativism.Ben Cassidy - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):547-552.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations