Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Introduction: Ethnography, Moral Theory, and Comparative Religious Ethics.Bharat Ranganathan & David A. Clairmont - 2017 - Journal of Religious Ethics 45 (4):613-622.
    Representing a spectrum of intellectual concerns and methodological commitments in religious ethics, the contributors to this focus issue consider and assess the advantages and disadvantages of the shift in recent comparative religious ethics away from a rootedness in moral theory toward a model that privileges the ethnography of moral worlds. In their own way, all of the contributors think through and emphasize the meaning, importance, and place of normativity in recent comparative religious ethics.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The present state of the comparative study of religious ethics: An update.John Kelsay - 2012 - Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (4):583-602.
    A survey of developments over the last forty years suggests that little progress has been made in the development of comparative religious ethics as a discipline. While authors working in this field have produced a number of interesting works, the field lacks structure, including an agreement on the basic purpose, terms, and approaches by which contributions may be evaluated as better or worse. I provide an account of this history, suggesting that a way forward will involve marrying ethicists' interest in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • A response to Hans lucht's “violence and morality: The concession of loss in a ghanaian fishing village”.Simeon O. Ilesanmi - 2010 - Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (3):478-484.
    The violent encounter between Africans and the forces of globalization raises the question of whether Africans should capitulate to these forces or seek to morally transform them, notwithstanding the uncertainty of achieving success. This essay argues that an exclusively existentialist interpretation of the African predicaments is inadequate because it erects a false dichotomy between African religious and moral sensibilities. It proposes instead an ethic of responsibility that affirms the interdependence of not only these two realms of life, but also of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations