Switch to: References

Citations of:

Proper names

Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Emmanuel Lévinas (1996)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The call and the response. Martin Heidegger and Martin Buber on responsibility.Artur JEWUŁA - 2013 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 3 (2):323-338.
    Filozofia subiektywności dotarła w XX wieku do granic swoich możliwości. Jako odpowiedź na jej ograniczenia rozmaici filozofowie podjęli próby nowego rodzaju myślenia. Takie próby to m.in. myśl dialogiczna, która pierwszy wyraz znalazła w pismach takich filozofów, jak Franz Rosenzweig, Martin Buber czy Eberhard Grisebach. Innym przykładem jest postulat powrotu do pytania o bycie Martina Heideggera. W niniejszym artykule staram się pokazać, że obie próby mają ze sobą wiele wspólnego, choć ich przedstawiciele odnosili się do siebie nawzajem raczej krytycznie, o ile (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Where Nothing Happened: The Experience of War Captivity and Levinas’s Concept of the ‘There Is’.Johanna Jacques - 2017 - Social and Legal Studies 26 (2):230-248.
    This article takes as its subject matter the juridico-political space of the prisoner of war (POW) camp. It sets out to determine the nature of this space by looking at the experience of war captivity by Jewish members of the Western forces in World War II, focusing on the experience of Emmanuel Levinas, who spent 5 years in German war captivity. On the basis of a historical analysis of the conditions in which Levinas spent his time in captivity, it argues (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Binding of Abraham: Levinas’s Moment in Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling.Robert C. Reed - 2017 - Sophia 56 (1):81-98.
    Most readings of Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling take its account of the Abraham and Isaac story to imply fairly obviously that duty towards God is absolutely distinct from, and therefore capable of superseding, duty towards neighbor or son. This paper will argue, however, that the Akedah, or ‘binding’ of Isaac, as Kierkegaard’s pseudonym, Johannes de Silentio, depicts it, binds Abraham to Isaac in a revitalized neighbor relation that is not at all subordinate, in any simple way, to Abraham’s God-relation. The (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Must Dewey and Kierkegaard's Inquiry for World Peace be Violent?R. Scott Webster - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (5):521-533.
    Amongst the many aims of education, surely the pursuit of global peace must be one of the most significant. The mandate of UNESCO is to pursue world peace through education by primarily promoting collaboration. The sort of collaboration that UNESCO endorses involves democratic dialogue, where various persons from differing backgrounds can come together, listen, negotiate and discuss possible ways in which peace might be pursued. While this sort of democratic dialogue with its associated free intellectual inquiry is more readily acceptable (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Education as ethics: Emmanuel Levinas on Jewish schooling.Jordan Glass - 2018 - Continental Philosophy Review 51 (4):481-505.
    For Levinas, the moment of real meaning is in the relation sustained with alterity. This relation is difficult or impossible to characterize philosophically, however, because to render it in comprehensive or objective terms would reduce the relation to one of comprehension and make it commensurate with the ego. Thus philosophy has an ambivalent status with respect to transcendence and ethics; but Levinas is convinced of the essentially transcendent or ethical meaning of Judaic practice: Talmudic exegesis, but also Jewish ritual and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The 'face' of the il y a: Levinas and Blanchot on impersonal existence.Kris Sealey - 2013 - Continental Philosophy Review 46 (3):431-448.
    This essay argues for a reading of Levinas’ work which prioritizes the significance of the il y a over the personal Other. I buttress this reading by using the well-documented intersections between Levinas’ work and that of Maurice Blanchot. Said otherwise, I argue that Levinas’ relationship with Blanchot (a relationship that is very much across the notion of the il y a) calls scholars of the Levinasian corpus to place the conception of impersonal existence to the forefront. To do so (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Helping more than “a little”: recent books on Kierkegaard and philosophy of religion. [REVIEW]J. Aaron Simmons - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72 (3):227-242.
    Helping more than “a little”: recent books on Kierkegaard and philosophy of religion Content Type Journal Article Category Book Review Pages 1-16 DOI 10.1007/s11153-012-9345-6 Authors J. Aaron Simmons, Department of Philosophy, Furman University, 3300 Poinsett Hwy, Greenville, SC 29613, USA Journal International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Online ISSN 1572-8684 Print ISSN 0020-7047.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (2 other versions)Editorial introduction.Campbell Jones - 2007 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 16 (3):196–202.
    This special issue contains papers first presented at a conference that was held 14–16 May 2008 at the Centre for Philosophy and Political Economy at the University of Leicester. Each of the papers takes up ideas from the works of Jacques Derrida and seeks to apply these to questions of business, ethics and business ethics. The papers take up quite different parts of Derrida's works, from his work on the animal, narrative and story, the violence of codification and the limits (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • May one murder the innocent for the sake of faith in God or filial piety to parents? A comparative study of Abraham’s and Guo’s stories.Qingping Liu - 2017 - Asian Philosophy 27 (1):43-58.
    Through a comparative analysis of the stories of Abraham and Guo, this article tries to argue that some particularistic claims of Christianity and Confucianism, which regard faith in God or filial piety to parents respectively as the sole ultimate principle of human life, may constitute the spiritual mainstay of such serious evils as murdering the innocent in certain in-depth paradoxes. Only by assigning a supreme position to their universal ideas of loving all humans through their self-transformations could the two ethico-religious (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Messianism’s contribution to political philosophy: peace and war in Levinas’s Totality and Infinity.Hanoch Ben-Pazi - 2017 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 81 (3):291-313.
    This article examines the impact of messianic thought on political philosophy in the theory of philosopher Emmanuel Levinas. Levinas’s work enables us to consider the political not only in terms of contemplation of the tension between the political and the ethical and of the ethical limits of politics but as an attempt to create ethical political thought. Discussion of the tension between the political and the ethical intensifies in wartime and in the context of militaristic thinking. At the same time, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • WHAT ABOUT ISAAC?: Rereading Fear and Trembling and Rethinking Kierkegaardian Ethics.J. Aaron Simmons - 2007 - Journal of Religious Ethics 35 (2):319-345.
    In this essay I offer a reading of Fear and Trembling that responds to critiques of Kierkegaardian ethics as being, as Brand Blanshard claims, “morally nihilistic,” as Emmanuel Levinas contends, ethically violent, and, as Alasdair MacIntyre charges, simply irrational. I argue that by focusing on Isaac's singularity as the very condition for Abraham's “ordeal,” the book presents a story about responsible subjectivity. Rather than standing in competition with the relation to God, the relation to other people is, thus, inscribed into (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • A reconsideration of Kierkegaard's understanding of the human other: The hidden ethics of soteriology.Leo Stan - 2010 - Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (2):349-370.
    In this article, I embark on an analysis of Søren Kierkegaard's view of human otherness in strict correlation to his Christian philosophy. More specifically, my aim is to show that Kierkegaard's thought is essentially informed by a decisive appropriation of the soteriological category of sin which has momentous implications for Kierkegaard's views of selfhood and intersubjectivity. The main argument is that both Kierkegaard's negative evaluation of human otherness and his acerbic indictments of any collectivist interference in salvific matters cohere with (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Patrick Sheil: Kierkegaard and Levinas: The Subjunctive Mood: Ashgate, Surrey, England, 2010, xviii + 288 pp. [REVIEW]Adam Buben - 2011 - Human Studies 34 (4):475-480.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Levinas and the Philosophy of Religion.Stephen Minister & Jackson Murtha - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (11):1023-1033.
    This article explores the significance of the work of Emmanuel Levinas for the philosophy of religion. Levinas is well‐known as the philosopher of the face of the other which provokes infinite responsibility. In his account of ethical responsibility to the other he regularly employs religious references, though rarely with extended explanations. This article considers a variety of interpretations of these religious references. Given the importance of Judaism for Levinas, we first examine whether Levinas should be understood as a philosopher or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Review of Clarence Joldersma A Levinasian Ethics for Education's Commonplaces: Between Calling and Inspiration. [REVIEW]Denise Egéa - 2015 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 35 (1):103-106.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Beyond the Self, Beyond Ontology: Levinas' Reading of Shestov's Reading of Kierkegaard.James McLachlan - 2010 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (2):179-196.
    In 1937, Emmanuel Levinas published a review of Lev Shestov’s Kierkegaard et la philosophie existentielle in the journal Revue des Études Juives. This essay includes a translation of his review as well as an introductory essay that contextualizes it. In her Emmanuel Levinas: The Problem of Ethical Metaphysics (1972), Edith Wyschogrod contended that Levinas’ short review contains what “might well be taken as the program of his own future work.” Both seek a way out of ontology, but Shestov seeks his (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Response to Anna yampolskaya’s review of Levinas, Kant and the problematic of temporality.Adonis Frangeskou - 2020 - HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology 9 (1):355-365.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark