Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The headscarf controversy: A response to Jill Marshall.Sharon Cowan - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (3):193-201.
    This paper argues that Article 8 of the ECHR, as applied to the protection of a person’s right to wear a headscarf, is an inappropriate locus for thrashing out arguments about the right to protection of religious freedom, and that Article 9 allows for a broader legal and political analysis of the multiple meanings and impacts of religion in our lives. However, the law should not prohibit women from wearing the headscarf. Legal regulation of the headscarf should be replaced with (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Direitos humanos fundamentais e práticas culturais controvertidas: uma nova leitura sobre o conceito de dignidade humana.Narciso Leandro Xavier Baez & Orides Mezzaroba - 2012 - Filosofia Unisinos 13 (1).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Pluralism and the Interpretation of Women's Human Rights.Silvina Alvarez - 2009 - European Journal of Women's Studies 16 (2):125-141.
    Since conflicts of human rights can be translated into conflicts of values, this article looks into the sources and extension of value pluralism for a better understanding of the sort of conflicts of human rights that women face in multicultural contexts. Furthermore, a proper understanding of personal autonomy as a founding value underlying individual rights can contribute to an interpretation of women's human rights that takes account of both their untouchable core as well as their contextual meaning. As conflicts of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Women’s Right to Autonomy and Identity in European Human Rights Law: Manifesting One’s Religion.Jill Marshall - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (3):177-192.
    Freedom of religious expression is to many a fundamental element of their identity. Yet the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the Islamic headscarf issue does not refer to autonomy and identity rights of the individual women claimants. The case law focuses on Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which provides a legal human right to freedom of religious expression. The way that provision is interpreted is critically contrasted here with the right to personal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • What Not To Wear: Islamic Dress And School Uniforms: R v. Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] U.K.H.L. 15. [REVIEW]Lieve Gies - 2006 - Feminist Legal Studies 14 (3):377-389.
    In this appeal the House of Lords held that a school’s refusal to change its school uniform rules to accommodate the religious beliefs of one of its pupils did not constitute an interference with freedom of religion and the right to an education. This note asks whether the House of Lords by framing the issue as a matter of individual choice and informed consent may have underestimated the potential for social harm inflicted by a school’s unwillingness to accommodate certain types (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark