Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Key Physician Behaviors that Predict Prudent, Preference Concordant Decisions at the End of Life.Andre Morales, Alan Murphy, Joseph B. Fanning, Shasha Gao, Kevan Schultz, Daniel E. Hall & Amber Barnato - 2021 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 12 (4):215-226.
    Background This study introduces an empirical approach for studying the role of prudence in physician treatment of end-of-life (EOL) decision making.Methods A mixed-methods analysis of transcripts from 88 simulated patient encounters in a multicenter study on EOL decision making. Physicians in internal medicine, emergency medicine, and critical care medicine were asked to evaluate a decompensating, end-stage cancer patient. Transcripts of the encounters were coded for actor, action, and content to capture the concept of Aristotelian prudence, and then quantitatively and qualitatively (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Usage of do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders in a Swedish community hospital – patient involvement, documentation and compliance.Emilie Bertilsson, Birgitta Semark, Kristina Schildmeijer, Anders Bremer & Jörg Carlsson - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-6.
    Background To characterize patients dying in a community hospital with or without attempting cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to describe patient involvement in, documentation of, and compliance with decisions on resuscitation. Methods All patients who died in Kalmar County Hospital during January 1, 2016 until December 31, 2016 were included. All information from the patients’ electronic chart was analysed. Results Of 660 patients female), 30 were pronounced dead in the emergency department after out-of-hospital CPR. Of the remaining 630 patients a DNAR order (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Should Human Rights and Autonomy be The Primary Determinants for the Disclosure of a Decision to Withhold Futile Resuscitation?Sarah Cahill - 2019 - The New Bioethics 25 (1):39-59.
    Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions (DNACPR) are considered good medical practice for those dying at the end of natural life. They avoid intrusive and inappropriate intervention. Historically, informing patients of these decisions was discretionary to avoid undue distress. Recent legal rulings have altered clinical guidance: disclosure is now all but obligatory. The basis for these legal judgments was respect for the patient’s autonomy as an expression of their human rights. Through critical analysis, this paper explores other bioethical considerations and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark