Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Question of Method in Ethics Consultation: Transforming a Career into a Profession?Wesley J. Smith - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (4):42-43.
    (2001). The Question of Method in Ethics Consultation: Transforming a Career into a Profession? The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 42-43.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Ethics Consultation: Permission from Patients and Other Problems of Method.Robert M. Veatch - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (4):43-45.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Christian ethics--an irrelevance or the salvation of medicine?J. S. Horner - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (3):133-134.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The elimination of morality.J. Harris - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (4):220-224.
    Anne Maclean has written a book which purports to identify and then definitively to reject the claims which she perceives to be the claims of bioethics. If she is right, then the enterprise to which this journal is dedicated is misconceived and worthless. In this paper, I attempt to show why so far from being not right she is comprehensively wrong, both in her understanding of the nature of bioethics and in the specific moral claims she makes about those she (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Consequentialism, Moralities of Concern, and Selfishness.Ted Honderich - 1996 - Philosophy 71 (278):499 - 520.
    Here are some kinds of reasons for taking an action to have been morally right. It was done out of a good intention or a pure good will on the part of the agent, or was owed to a virtue of hers. It issued from the agent's moral perception or intuition with respect to a situation, not from the application of a general principle or from calculation of the consequences of possible actions. Although it would give rise to distress or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Survival of the Survival Lottery.C. J. Mcknight - 1996 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):101-108.
    ABSTRACT In his paper ‘The Survival Lottery’John Harris suggested that there could be situations where the rational thing to do would be to kill a healthy person and harvest his organs for transplantation, thereby saving several lives at the cost of one. Anne Maclean claims that such a proposal, far from being rational, does not qualify as a moral proposal at all since what it suggests is ‘plain murder’. I argue that she is correct to claim that the proposal is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Consequential utilitarianism: Addressing ethical deficiencies in the municipal landfill siting process. [REVIEW]Ruth Burnice McKay - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 26 (4):289 - 306.
    This paper examines ethical concerns of the utilitarian paradigm, the greatest good for the greatest number, advocated by many proponents and consultants in siting landfills. The implications of the consequentialist utilitarian approach are considered through the examination of a landfill-site-search case study in Ontario, Canada. Limitations to such an approach, in terms of differing values, equal consideration, equitable participation, distributive justice and the emphasis on non-quantifiable factors are discussed. Recommendations to improve the process are made based on the ethical analysis (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Justifying Self-Partiality.Agnès Baehni - forthcoming - Philosophia:1-17.
    The role that the first-person perspective is allowed to play in moral reasoning is a major source of contemporary debate between partialists and impartialists. The discussion usually revolves around the question of partiality’s justification when it is intended to benefit our loved ones. Surprisingly, the issue of partiality to oneself is rarely addressed directly and its link with egoism is left unexplored. This is a gap that this paper attempts to fill by focusing on some of the difficulties raised by (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Causation, Responsibility, and Harm: How the Discursive Shift from Law and Ethics to Social Justice Sealed the Plight of Nonhuman Animals.Matti Häyry - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (2):246-267.
    Moral and political philosophers no longer condemn harm inflicted on nonhuman animals as self-evidently as they did when animal welfare and animal rights advocacy was at the forefront in the 1980s, and sentience, suffering, species-typical behavior, and personhood were the basic concepts of the discussion. The article shows this by comparing the determination with which societies seek responsibility for human harm to the relative indifference with which law and morality react to nonhuman harm. When harm is inflicted on humans, policies (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Climate change and anti-natalism: Between the horrible and the unthinkable.Konrad Szocik & Matti Häyry - 2024 - South African Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):21-29.
    There is no longer any doubt that the coming decades will bring serious threats to humanity from anthropogenic climate change. As we have suggested elsewhere, horrible scenarios are far more realistic than non-horrible ones, and science and technology are incapable, especially in our non-ideal world, of equitably distributing wealth, access to resources and adaptations to climate change. In this article, we offer an alternative to these inevitable horrible scenarios. The alternative is to implement either an anti-natalist policy, or procreative beneficence (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Guinea Pig Duties: 4. The Extent and Limits of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (4):115-121.
    In a series of articles, I set out my belief that investigators and subjects of research should work together in a partnership based in shared aims. Such a relationship – quite different from what is usual today – would impose duties on both partners. In earlier papers I explored the origin and nature of the duties that would fall on patients; here I examine their limits.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Guinea Pig Duties: 6. Non-Consensual Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (2):51-58.
    In the first five of these articles I have questioned the justice, and effectiveness, of total dependence in clinical research on willing volunteers. I have explored ways that might better and more equitably spread the burden of participating in clinical research as subjects of it. Here I consider this question: if consent is the barrier, must we regard consent as indispensable?
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Guinea Pig Duties: 8. Another Way.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (4):132-135.
    This series of articles have explored the need that society has for clinical research to be done and the consequent sets of duties that call on the one hand upon investigators to carry it out and on the other upon patients to be subjects of it. The purpose of the discussions has been to understand what should be the relationship between investigators and patient-subjects in order that both might meet their obligations effectively, efficiently, safely and with mutual respect. Here I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The new enhancement technologies and the place of vulnerability in our lives.John G. Quilter - 2016 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37 (1):9-27.
    What is the place of vulnerability in our lives? The current debate about the ethics of enhancement technologies provides a context in which to think about this question. In my view, the current debate is likely to be fruitless, largely because we bring the wrong ethical resources to bear on its questions. In this article, I recall an important, but currently neglected, role that moral concepts play in our thinking, a role they should especially play in relation to the introduction (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Bleak House of Surrogacy: Broidy v. St Helen's and Knowsley Health Authority. [REVIEW]Derek Morgan - 2001 - Feminist Legal Studies 9 (1):57-67.
    This note examines the British case of Broidy v. St Helen's andKnowsley Health Authority in which Margaret Broidy was unsuccessful in anegligence action against the defendant Health Authority following an emergency caesareanoperation in which a hysterectomy had been performed as `essential'. Of particularfeminist interest is the fact that Broidy's claim for, inter alia, the costs of asurrogacy arrangement to be carried out in California was refused on the basis that it wasnot reasonable – the chances of success of the surrogacy (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A case study: “The Earth Charter” in Middle Schools Bioethics Education.Paolo Martena - 2016 - International Journal of Ethics Education 1 (2):137-144.
    Since the 70s of last century, people started to talk about philosophy for children in order to improve students’ ability to think through the philosophical dialogue. Nowadays we wonder whether it makes sense to talk about ethics and bioethics for positively influencing the civil life of pupils. It is certainly right, in fact, that the public school is secular, but it cannot be totally deprived of values. This problem cannot be solved with the study of Religion in school, but perhaps (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Efficiency and Health.T. Hussey - 1997 - Nursing Ethics 4 (3):181-190.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Abortion: Why Bioethics Can Have No Answer – A Personal Perspective.Geoffrey Hunt - 1999 - Nursing Ethics 6 (1):47-57.
    Abortion is one of the great moral debates of the epoch. Is there a rational method by which the debate can be resolved? Can bioethics' promise of such a method be fulfilled? Surely, a strictly rational approach can establish solid grounds for our beliefs once and for all. We would then be justified in deeming as unreasonable anyone who does not accept the perfectly rational conclusions. I present two scenarios to show that there can be no such philosophically grounded method (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Anti-theory in action? Planning for pandemics, triage and ICU or: how not to bite a bullet. [REVIEW]Nathan Emmerich - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (1):91-100.
    Anti-theory is a multi-faceted critique of moral theory which, it appears, is undergoing something of reassessment. In a recent paper Hämäläinen discusses the relevance of an anti-theoretical perspective for the activity of applied ethics. This paper explores her view of anti-theory. In particular I examine its relevance for understanding the formal guidance on pandemic flu planning issues by the Department of Health in the UK and some subsequent discussions around triage and reverse triage decisions which may be considered by both (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Individual in Mainstream Health Economics: A Case of Persona Non-grata. [REVIEW]John B. Davis & Robert McMaster - 2007 - Health Care Analysis 15 (3):195-210.
    This paper is motivated by Davis’ [14] theory of the individual in economics. Davis’ analysis is applied to health economics, where the individual is conceived as a utility maximiser, although capable of regarding others’ welfare through interdependent utility functions. Nonetheless, this provides a restrictive and flawed account, engendering a narrow and abstract conception of care grounded in Paretian value and Cartesian analytical frames. Instead, a richer account of the socially embedded individual is advocated, which employs collective intentionality analysis. This provides (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Designing ethicists.Michael C. Brannigan - 1996 - Health Care Analysis 4 (3):206-218.
    In the United States, disturbing concerns pertaining to both how putative bioethicists are perceived and the potential for the abuse of their power in connection with these perceptions compel close examination. This paper addresses these caveats by examining two fundamental and interrelated components in the image-construction of the ethicist: definitional and contextual. Definitional features reveal that perceptions and images of the ethicist are especially subject to distortion due to a lack of clarity as to the nature and qualifications of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Living bioethics, theories and children’s consent to heart surgery.Priscilla Alderson, Deborah Bowman, Joe Brierley, Nathalie Dedieu, Martin J. Elliott, Jonathan Montgomery & Hugo Wellesley - forthcoming - Clinical Ethics:147775092210910.
    Background This analysis is about practical living bioethics and how law, ethics and sociology understand and respect children’s consent to, or refusal of, elective heart surgery. Analysis of underlying theories and influences will contrast legalistic bioethics with living bioethics. In-depth philosophical analysis compares social science traditions of positivism, interpretivism, critical theory and functionalism and applies them to bioethics and childhood, to examine how living bioethics may be encouraged or discouraged. Illustrative examples are drawn from research interviews and observations in two (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark