Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Powers, causation, and modality.Robert K. Shope - 1988 - Erkenntnis 28 (3):321 - 362.
    A complex theory concerning powers, natures, and causal necessity has emerged from the writings of P. H. Hare, E. H. Madden, and R. Harré. In the course of rebutting objections that other critics have raised to the power account of causation, I correct three of its genuine difficulties: its attempt to analyze power attributions in terms of conditional statements; its characterization of the relation between something's powers and its nature; and its doctrines concerning conceptual necessity. The resulting interpretation of causal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Harre and Madden's multifarious account of natural necessity.Raymond Woller - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (4):616-632.
    In this paper, I critically examine Harre and Madden's attempt, largely as it occurs in their Causal Powers, to secure for causes and laws of nature a kind of necessity which although consistent with commonsensical empiricism and anti-idealistic philosophy of science nevertheless runs counter to the humean-positivistic tradition, which denies the existence of any distinctively "natural" or causal necessity. In the course of the paper, I reveal the multifarious nature of their account and show that each part of that account, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Divine Causation.Richard T. McClelland & Robert J. Deltete - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):3-25.
    Quentin Smith has argued that it is logically impossible for there to be a divine cause of the universe. His argument is based on a Humean analysis of causation (confined to event causation, specifically excluding any consideration of agency) and a principle drawn from that analysis that he takes to be a logical requirement for every possibly valid theory of causation. He also thinks that all divine volitions are efficacious of logical necessity. We argue that all of these claims are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Language, Berkeley, and God.E. G. King - 1970 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (2):112 - 123.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Powers That Be.E. H. Madden & P. H. Hare - 1971 - Dialogue 10 (1):12-31.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Hume and the fiery furnace.Edward H. Madden - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (1):64-78.
    There are a standard number of replies to the riddle of induction, none of which has gained ascendency. It seems that a new approach is needed that concedes less to the Humean dialectic. Humeans, both traditional and contemporary, unwittingly play on the ambiguity of the phrase "change in the course of nature," and that is why `C· ∼ E' appears to be self-consistent, though in fact it is not. I provide an analysis of 'cause' and 'natural necessity' which gives inductive (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • (1 other version)Madden's account of necessity in causation.Michael P. Levine - 1988 - Philosophia 18 (1):75-96.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Where are we now in the theory of the mind?Rom Harre - 1973 - Philosophical Papers 2 (October):41-51.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Justification of Empirical Belief in Hume's "Treatise".Norman Scott Arnold - 1979 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark