Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Non-safety Assessments of Genome-Edited Organisms: Should They be Included in Regulation?Bjørn Kåre Myskja & Anne Ingeborg Myhr - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2601-2627.
    This article presents and evaluates arguments supporting that an approval procedure for genome-edited organisms for food or feed should include a broad assessment of societal, ethical and environmental concerns; so-called non-safety assessment. The core of analysis is the requirement of the Norwegian Gene Technology Act that the sustainability, ethical and societal impacts of a genetically modified organism should be assessed prior to regulatory approval of the novel products. The article gives an overview how this requirement has been implemented in the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • A social and ethical game-changer? An empirical ethics study of CRISPR in the salmon farming industry.Hannah Winther, Torill Blix, Lotte Holm, Anne Ingeborg Myhr & Bjørn Myskja - 2024 - Environmental Values 33 (5):476-494.
    The genome editing technology CRISPR is described as a technological game-changer because of its flexibility and precision, and as an ethical game-changer due to its ability to engineer traits in living organisms without crossing species, avoiding a significant objection to genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In salmon farming, applications of CRISPR in breeding hold the promise of handling environmental and fish welfare challenges yet require social acceptance. Adopting an empirical bioethics framework, this stakeholder interview study shows that respecting species borders is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation