Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The process of peer review: Unanswered questions.Linda D. Nelson - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):158-159.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Some indices of the reliability of peer review.Robert Rosenthal - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):160-161.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Chairman's action: The importance of executive decisions in peer review.Peter Tyrer - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):164-165.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?J. Scott Armstrong & Raymond Hubbard - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):136-137.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Unreliable peer review: Causes and cures of human misery.Andrew M. Colman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):141-142.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Confusion between reviewer reliability and wise editorial and funding decisions.Charles A. Kiesler - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):151-152.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Replication, reliability and peer review: A case study.Michael E. Gorman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):149-149.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Disagreement among journal reviewers: No cause for undue alarm.Lawrence J. Stricker - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):163-164.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Is there an alternative to peer review?Richard Greene - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):149-150.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Reflections on the peer review process.Herbert W. Marsh & Samuel Ball - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):157-158.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):119-135.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review.John C. Bailar - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):137-138.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Peer review: Explicit criteria and training can help.Fred Delcomyn - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):144-144.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Justice, efficiency and epistemology in the peer review of scientific manuscripts.Michael J. Mahoney - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):157-157.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue.Robert F. Bornstein - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):138-139.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • What should be done improve reviewing?Rick Crandall - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):143-143.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Why is the reliability of peer review so low?Donald Laming - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):154-156.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Should the blinded lead the blinded?Stephen P. Lock - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):156-157.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Reflections from the peer review mirror.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):167-186.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • What to do about peer review: Is the cure worse than the disease?Thomas R. Zentall - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):166-167.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Consensus and the reliability of peer-review evaluations.Stephen Cole - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):140-141.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Do we really want more “reliable” reviewers?Helena Chmura Kraemer - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):152-154.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Toward openness and fairness in the review process.Byron P. Rourke - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):161-161.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Peer review: An unflattering picture.Kenneth M. Adams - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):135-136.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Is unreliability in peer review harmful?Henry L. Roediger - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):159-160.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Referee agreement in context.Lowell L. Hargens - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):150-151.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Now that we know how low the reliability is, what shall we do?Kurt Salzinger - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):162-162.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • The Lighter Side of Deception Research in the Social Sciences: Social Work as Comedy.William Epstein - 2006 - Journal of Information Ethics 15 (1):11-26.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • In praise of randomness.Peter H. Schönemann - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):162-163.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Different rates of agreement on acceptance and rejection: A statistical artifact?Marilyn E. Demorest - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):144-145.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Journal availability and the quality of published research.Jack M. Fletcher - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):146-147.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Do peer reviewers really agree more on rejections than acceptances? A random-agreement benchmark says they do not.Gerald S. Wasserman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):165-166.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • On forecasting validity and finessing reliability.J. Barnard Gilmore - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):148-149.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Peer review is not enough: Editors must work with librarians to ensure access to research.Steve Fuller - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):147-148.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • When nonreliability of reviews indicates solid science.Douglas Lee Eckberg - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):145-146.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Evaluating scholarly works: How many reviewers? How much anonymity?John D. Cone - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):142-142.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?Patricia Cohen - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):139-140.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
    Home | Bibliographies | About PhilArchive | Contact us | Code of conduct

    CDP Phiosophy Documentation Center
    PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
    This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

    Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
    All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation

    Server: philpapers-web-6f97f49787-zlfb6 uwo