Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Peer review: An unflattering picture.Kenneth M. Adams - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):135-136.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue.Robert F. Bornstein - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):138-139.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • When nonreliability of reviews indicates solid science.Douglas Lee Eckberg - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):145-146.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Peer review is not enough: Editors must work with librarians to ensure access to research.Steve Fuller - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):147-148.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Is unreliability in peer review harmful?Henry L. Roediger - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):159-160.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Some indices of the reliability of peer review.Robert Rosenthal - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):160-161.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • In praise of randomness.Peter H. Schönemann - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):162-163.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):119-135.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process.Jo Ann Carland, James W. Carland & Carroll D. Aby - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):95 - 104.
    The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse of the editorial process and points to a need for formal recognition of rules for review. The manuscript culminates with proposed Codes of Ethics for researchers, referees and editors and suggestions for improvement of the peer review (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Reflections from the peer review mirror.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):167-186.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • The process of peer review: Unanswered questions.Linda D. Nelson - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):158-159.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review.John C. Bailar - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):137-138.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • On forecasting validity and finessing reliability.J. Barnard Gilmore - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):148-149.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Confusion between reviewer reliability and wise editorial and funding decisions.Charles A. Kiesler - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):151-152.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Should the blinded lead the blinded?Stephen P. Lock - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):156-157.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?J. Scott Armstrong & Raymond Hubbard - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):136-137.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Do we really want more “reliable” reviewers?Helena Chmura Kraemer - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):152-154.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Why is the reliability of peer review so low?Donald Laming - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):154-156.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Journal availability and the quality of published research.Jack M. Fletcher - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):146-147.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Toward openness and fairness in the review process.Byron P. Rourke - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):161-161.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?Patricia Cohen - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):139-140.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What to do about peer review: Is the cure worse than the disease?Thomas R. Zentall - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):166-167.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Do peer reviewers really agree more on rejections than acceptances? A random-agreement benchmark says they do not.Gerald S. Wasserman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):165-166.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Chairman's action: The importance of executive decisions in peer review.Peter Tyrer - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):164-165.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Disagreement among journal reviewers: No cause for undue alarm.Lawrence J. Stricker - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):163-164.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Now that we know how low the reliability is, what shall we do?Kurt Salzinger - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):162-162.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reflections on the peer review process.Herbert W. Marsh & Samuel Ball - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):157-158.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Justice, efficiency and epistemology in the peer review of scientific manuscripts.Michael J. Mahoney - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):157-157.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Referee agreement in context.Lowell L. Hargens - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):150-151.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Is there an alternative to peer review?Richard Greene - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):149-150.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Replication, reliability and peer review: A case study.Michael E. Gorman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):149-149.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Different rates of agreement on acceptance and rejection: A statistical artifact?Marilyn E. Demorest - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):144-145.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Peer review: Explicit criteria and training can help.Fred Delcomyn - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):144-144.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What should be done improve reviewing?Rick Crandall - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):143-143.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Evaluating scholarly works: How many reviewers? How much anonymity?John D. Cone - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):142-142.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Unreliable peer review: Causes and cures of human misery.Andrew M. Colman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):141-142.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Consensus and the reliability of peer-review evaluations.Stephen Cole - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):140-141.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark