Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Erich Kretschmann as a proto-logical-empiricist: Adventures and misadventures of the point-coincidence argument.Marco Giovanelli - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (2):115-134.
    The present paper attempts to show that a 1915 article by Erich Kretschmann must be credited not only for being the source of Einstein’s point-coincidence remark, but also for having anticipated the main lines of the logical-empiricist interpretation of general relativity. Whereas Kretschmann was inspired by the work of Mach and Poincaré, Einstein inserted Kretschmann’s point-coincidence parlance into the context of Ricci and Levi-Civita’s absolute differential calculus. Kretschmann himself realized this and turned the point-coincidence argument against Einstein in his second (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • The definition of rigidity in the special theory of relativity and the genesis of the general theory of relativity.Giulio Maltese & Lucia Orlando - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26 (3):263-306.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The definition of rigidity in the special theory of relativity and the genesis of the general theory of relativity.Giulio Maltese & Lucia Orlando - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26 (3):263-306.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The Forgotten Tradition: How the Logical Empiricists Missed the Philosophical Significance of the Work of Riemann, Christoffel and Ricci.Marco Giovanelli - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (6):1219-1257.
    This paper attempts to show how the logical empiricists’ interpretation of the relation between geometry and reality emerges from a “collision” of mathematical traditions. Considering Riemann’s work as the initiator of a 19th century geometrical tradition, whose main protagonists were Helmholtz and Poincaré, the logical empiricists neglected the fact that Riemann’s revolutionary insight flourished instead in a non-geometrical tradition dominated by the works of Christoffel and Ricci-Curbastro roughly in the same years. I will argue that, in the attempt to interpret (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations