Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. 6 Does Berkeley Have a Theory of Meaning?Margaret Atherton - 2024 - In Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.), Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 99-126.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Did Berkeley Endorse the Resemblance Theory of Representation?Dávid Bartha - 2024 - In Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.), Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 27-48.
    The resemblance theory of representation is the view that one thing represents another by virtue of resembling it. Typically, it is taken as non-controversial that Berkeley accepts the resemblance theory of representation – even if the plausibility of the resemblance theory itself comes under scrutiny. One piece of evidence in favour of this reading of Berkeley is his commitment to the ‘likeness principle’: the view that ‘an idea can be like nothing but an idea’ (PHK § 8). The likeness principle (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs.Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.) - 2024 - Boston: De Gruyter.
    This volume focuses on Berkeley's doctrine of signs. The 'doctrine of signs' refers to the use that Berkeley makes of a phenomenon that is central to a great deal of everyday discourse: one whereby certain perceivable entities are made to stand in for (as 'signs' of) something else. Things signified might be other perceivable entities or they might also be unperceivable notions - such as the meanings of words. From his earliest published work, A New Theory of Vision in 1710, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • 5 Is There Anybody Out There? Berkeley’s Indirect Realism About Other Minds.Peter West - 2024 - In Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.), Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 81-98.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark