Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Demonstrative contents and opaque thoughts. Reply to Valente.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2020 - Manuscrito 43 (4):130-141.
    Matheus Valente presents a number of examples designed to show that my theory of reference fixing for demonstratives violates the desideratum that demonstrative thoughts should be transparent to speakers. In this note I argue that the alleged desideratum is not really such and defend my theory against other criticisms made by Valente.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ordinary kinds and ontological angst. Reply to Demartini.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2020 - Manuscrito 43 (4):215-220.
    Thainá Demartini has criticized my view that ordinary natural kind terms refer to vague non-scientific kinds and defended the more traditional view that they refer to precise kinds discovered by science. In this note I reject Demartini’s worries as based on inadequate ontological scruples.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Do conflicting intentions give rise to multiple demonstrative reference? Reply to Mena.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2020 - Manuscrito 43 (4):189-198.
    According to Ricardo Mena, a demonstrative refers to all the objects that the utterer has an intention for it to refer to, which may be more than one in cases where her referential intentions conflict. In this note I argue that Mena’s proposal has several serious problems.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
    Home | Bibliographies | About PhilArchive | Contact us | Code of conduct

    CDP Phiosophy Documentation Center
    PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
    This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

    Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
    All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation

    Server: philpapers-web-6f97f49787-kd5kv uwo