Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Second-Order Science of Interdisciplinary Research: A Polyocular Framework for Wicked Problems.Hugo F. Alrøe & E. Noe - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):65-76.
    Context: The problems that are most in need of interdisciplinary collaboration are “wicked problems,” such as food crises, climate change mitigation, and sustainable development, with many relevant aspects, disagreement on what the problem is, and contradicting solutions. Such complex problems both require and challenge interdisciplinarity. Problem: The conventional methods of interdisciplinary research fall short in the case of wicked problems because they remain first-order science. Our aim is to present workable methods and research designs for doing second-order science in domains (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Complexity and Transdisciplinarity: Reflections on Theory and Practice.Alfonso Montuori - 2013 - World Futures 69 (4-6):200 - 230.
    (2013). Complexity and Transdisciplinarity: Reflections on Theory and Practice. World Futures: Vol. 69, The Complexity of Life and Lives of Complexity, pp. 200-230.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Authors’ Response: A Perspectivist View on the Perspectivist View of Interdisciplinary Science.H. F. Alrøe & E. Noe - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):88-95.
    Upshot: In our response we focus on five questions that point to important common themes in the commentaries: why start in wicked problems, what kind of system is a scientific perspective, what is the nature of second-order research processes, what does this mean for understanding interdisciplinary work, and how may polyocular research help make real-world decisions.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (5 other versions)Гендерна складова гуманістичного менеджменту: Теоретико-методологічний аспект.Ольга Венгер - 2014 - Гуманітарний Вісник Запорізької Державної Інженерної Академії 56:92-101.
    Досліджуються проблеми становлення гуманістичного менеджменту як нової концепції управління суспільством в центрі якої не абстрактна людина, а чоловік і жінка з їх потребами і інтересами, різними можливостями для їх самовизначення і реалізації; обґрунтовується необхідність врахування гендерної складової при впровадженні принципів гуманістичного управління як необхідної умови демократизації, формування соціальної держави та громадянського суспільства.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The paradox of scientific expertise: A perspectivist approach to knowledge asymmetries.Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe & Egon Noe - 2011 - Fachsprache - International Journal of Specialized Communication (3–4):152-167.
    Modern societies depend on a growing production of scientific knowledge, which is based on the functional differentiation of science into still more specialised scientific disciplines and subdisciplines. This is the basis for the paradox of scientific expertise: The growth of science leads to a fragmentation of scientific expertise. To resolve this paradox, the present paper investigates three hypotheses: 1) All scientific knowledge is perspectival. 2) The perspectival structure of science leads to specific forms of knowledge asymmetries. 3) Such perspectival knowledge (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Evolutionary learning for a post-industrial society: Knowledge, creativity & social ecology.Alfonso Montuori - 1993 - World Futures 36 (2):181-202.
    (1993). Evolutionary learning for a post‐industrial society: Knowledge, creativity & social ecology. World Futures: Vol. 36, Evolutionary Consciousness, pp. 181-202.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Heterogenistics: An epistemological restructuring of biological and social sciences.Magoroh Maruyama - 1977 - Acta Biotheoretica 26 (2):120-136.
    The epistemology which sees intra-specific and intra-group heterogenization, symbiotization, interactive pattern-generating and change as basic principles produces types of theories and research strategies different from the epistemology based on the notions of intra-specific and intra-group uniformity, competition and stabilization. In the uniformistic view, individual variations have been reduced mainly either to statistical deviations from the mean or to dominance relationship. On the other hand in the heterogenistic view, mutual beneficial interactions between qualitatively heterogeneous individuals within a group is regarded as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations