Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Setting Up A Discipline, Ii: British history of science and “the end of ideology”, 1931–1948.Anna-K. Mayer - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):41-72.
    For the history of science the 1940s were a transformative decade, when salient scholars like Herbert Butterfield or Alexandre Koyré set out to shape postwar culture by promoting new standards for understanding science. Some years ago I placed these developments in a tradition of enduring arts–science tensions and the contemporary notion that previous, “scientistic”, historical practices needed to be confronted with disinterested codes of historical craft. Here, I want to further explore the ideological dimensions of the processes through which the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Five Tourniquets and a Ship's Bell: The Special Session at the 1931 Congress.Christopher A. J. Chilvers - 2015 - Centaurus 57 (2):61-95.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Robert M. Young's Mind, Brain and Adaptation revisited.Christopher Lawrence - 2021 - British Journal for the History of Science 54 (1):61-77.
    Robert Maxwell Young's first book Mind, Brain and Adaptation in the Nineteenth Century, written from 1960 to 1965, still merits reading as a study of the naturalization of mind and its relation to social thought in Victorian Britain. I examine the book from two perspectives that give the volume its unique character: first, Young's interest in psychology, which he considered should be used to inform humane professional practices and be the basis of social reform; second, new approaches to the history (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Principles, exemplars, and uses of history in early 20th century genetics.Jeffrey M. Skopek - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2):210-225.
    This paper is concerned with the uses of history in science. It focuses in particular on Anglo-American genetics and on university textbooks—where the canon of a science is consolidated, as the heterogeneous approaches and controversies of its practice are rendered unified for its reproduction. Tracing the emergence and eventual standardization of geneticists’ use of a case-based method of teaching in the 1920s–1950s, this paper argues that geneticists created historical environments in their textbooks—spaces in which students developed an understanding of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations