Switch to: References

Citations of:

Ambiguity in moral choice

In Christopher Robert Kaczor (ed.), Proportionalism: for and against. Milwaukee, Wis.: Marquette University Press. pp. 252-253 (2000)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Lesser Evil Reasoning and its Pitfalls.Georg Spielthenner - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (2):139-152.
    We are often faced with dilemmatic situations in which we must choose between alternative courses of action, both of which will have a bad outcome. It is commonly held that in such cases it is both uncontroversial and unproblematic that we have to choose the lesser evil. However, despite its frequent application in ethical decision-making, lesser evil reasoning is not well understood by most of its advocates and it thus occasions much misunderstanding and it presents a number of pitfalls. In (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Intending Damage to Basic Goods.C. Tollefsen - 2008 - Christian Bioethics 14 (3):272-282.
    Richard McCormick justified his move to proportionalism in part because of the perceived inadequacy of the Grisez-Finnis approach to morality to answer the following question: “What is to count for turning against a basic good, and why?” In this paper, I provide the beginnings of an account of what it means to intend damage to a good; I then show that the account is readily exportable to judgments regarding killing and lying defended by Grisez and others. I then indicate that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Moral ambiguity? Yes. Moral confusion? No.Daniel B. McGee - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):11 – 12.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations