Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The practitioner as endangered citizen: a genealogy.Tom Koch - 2021 - Monash Bioethics Review 39 (2):157-168.
    Medical practice has always involved at least three roles, three complimentary identities. Practitioners have been at once clinicians dedicated to a patient’s care, members of a professional organization promoting medicine, and informed citizens engaged in public debates on health issues. Beginning in the 1970s, a series of social and technological changes affected, and in many cases restricted, the practitioner’s ability to function equally in these three identities. While others have discussed the changing realities of medical practice in recent decades, none (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Hippocratic Thorn in Bioethics' Hide: Cults, Sects, and Strangeness.T. Koch - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (1):75-88.
    Bioethicists have typically disdained where they did not simply ignore the Hippocratic tradition in medicine. Its exclusivity—an oath of and for physicians—seemed contrary to the perspective that bioethicists have attempted to invoke. Robert M. Veatch recently articulated this rejection of the Hippocratic tradition, and of a professional ethic of medicine in general, in a volume based on his Gifford lectures. Here that argument is critiqued. The strengths of the Hippocratic tradition as a flexible and ethical social doctrine are offered in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Ethicist as Language Czar, or Cop: “End of Life” v. “Ending Life”. [REVIEW]Tom Koch - 2013 - HEC Forum 25 (4):345-359.
    Bioethics promises a considered, unprejudicial approach to areas of medical decision-making. It does this, in theory, from the perspective of moral philosophy. But the promise of fairly considered, insightful commentary fails when word choices used in ethical arguments are prejudicial, foreclosing rather than opening an area of moral discourse. The problem is illustrated through an analysis of the language of The Royal Society Expert Panel Report: End of Life Decision Making advocating medical termination.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark